Posted on 11/28/2020 8:37:51 AM PST by Borges
Friedrich Engels was born on November 28, 1820, into a world on the cusp of change. The industrial revolution was spreading out from England like a wildfire. Armies of workers were rising up.
Engels' hometown of Barmen (now incorporated in the city of Wuppertal) was no exception. His father owned textile factories there and in Manchester, in England's industrial north. The industrialist's son, who studied and knew exactly how capitalism worked, would become — next to Karl Marx — its most famous critic.
A contradiction? Definitely a surprising turn, which fascinates many to this day. "For me Engels is bipolar," says Eckehard Lowisch. The sculptor from Wuppertal has designed a sculpture of the philosopher, sociologist, and revolutionary for his 200-year anniversary.
He was "a man who could enjoy shrimp and champagne in the morning and take a stroll through the poor working class neighborhoods of Manchester with his girlfriend in the evening," according to Lowisch, "both a capitalist and a revolutionary — in any case he had a great sense of social justice."
As the eldest of nine children, Friedrich was his father's chosen successor. He took his son out of school shortly before graduating so that he could take up a commercial apprenticeship. But the father and son often knocked heads. The contradiction between the pious religiosity and the capitalist greed bothered the young Engels.
Under the pseudonym Friedrich Oswald he published the Letters from Wuppertal, his first social critique. "A terrible misery reigns over the lower classes, especially the factory workers in Wuppertal," wrote the 19-year-old Engels, as eloquent as he was radical.
"In Elberfeld alone 1,200 out of 2,500 children have been taken out of school and are growing up in the factories to replace adult workers, just so that the factory owner doesn't have to pay an adult double the wages that he has to pay a child."
But what fueled the young Friedrich? Following his apprenticeship he voluntarily completed his military service with the royal Prussian artillery guard in Berlin. As a guest student he attended university lectures on philosophy, Asian languages and finance, and socialized in left-wing intellectual circles. In Cologne in 1842 he first met Karl Marx, then editor-in-chief of the Rheinische Zeitung.
Engels' father summoned him to his cotton mill in Manchester. Here he met the young Irish woman Mary Burns. Together with his future partner he would wander through Manchester's working class neighborhoods. He got to know the inhumane living and working conditions of the textile workers and committed his impressions to paper in the social study The Condition of the Working Class in England.
He observed that in many cases family order was turned upside down, the women working in the factories while the men sat at home minding the children, cooking and cleaning.
His work brought him ever closer to Karl Marx, who had meanwhile emigrated to Paris. Engels began to write for the German-French Annals, a journal published by Karl Marx and Arnold Ruge.
When the first communist meetings were held in Elberfeld in 1845, Engels gave speeches there. Together with Marx, he moved to Brussels, then traveled with him to London and Manchester. In London in 1847 they joined the "League of the Righteous," later the "Communist League" — for whom, a year later, they wrote the Communist Manifesto.
"Without Friedrich Engels," says historian Werner Plumpe from the University of Frankfurt am Main, "much of Karl Marx's writings would never have appeared."
Plumpe said in an interview with public radio broadcaster Deutschlandfunk that it was only through Engels' involvement that they became political statements. And without his money, Marx would have died of starvation.
"The Communist Manifesto is a collaborative effort, most of which was written by Karl Marx, but what's most important comes from Engels, which you can still see in his writings today. In other words, this willingness to formulate a clear political statement and then to say it and also to defend it vigorously, that runs through the Communist Manifesto," Plumpe said.
In the spring of 1849, as revolutionaries and workers went to the barricades in Barmen and Elberfeld, Engels was there. Later he also appeared at the Baden uprising. After the movement was crushed, he fled to Switzerland and on to England, where he worked as an statutory clerk from 1850 and later as a partner in his father's company.
Engels gave his friend Marx a helping hand financially, as well as with his publications. It’s often impossible to tell whose pen is behind the words.
Engels, for example, edited volumes two and three of Marx's main work Das Kapital posthumously from notes. In 1869, after he was able to sell his company shares, Engels moved to London to be with Marx.
After Marx's death in 1883, Engels became a leading figure in international Socialism. Especially respected by the German Social Democrats, Friedrich Engels is also revered in China.
Engels' birthplace has proclaimed 2020 an "Engels Year" and is creating a living memorial to Wuppertal's most famous son — from a community festival, concerts, exhibitions, tours and discussions.
Due to the corona pandemic, most of the birthday celebrations had to be canceled, including the reopening of the historic Engels House. But many events are taking place online so that November, according to the organizers, is "contact-free, but not Engels-free."
Engels is now reappearing in Wuppertal in the form of a life-sized sculpture. The multi-layered figure of marble slices is the work of sculptor Eckehard Lowisch.
But on the day of Engels' 200th anniversary, another existing sculpture of the thinker temporarily disappeared: A four-meter-high (13-foot-high) bronze that had been given to Engels' hometown by the Chinese government in 2014 was covered up in solidarity with protesters in Hong Kong.
The fact that Wuppertal had accepted the huge bronze donated by China had already been criticized in 2014
Organized by two literary societies, the Else-Lasker-Schüler and the Armin T. Wegner association, the demonstration aims to highlight the plight of activists in China by displaying photos and reading works of persecuted authors, including poems by the late Liu Xiaobo, the Chinese dissident who received the Nobel Prize while in prison.
"China suppresses freedom of speech, thought, information and assembly," wrote the organizers of the event in a statement. "Engels would be in prison or under house arrest in China today. He would be banned from his profession like thousands of Chinese authors, artists and bloggers."
Your point in posting?
The same as with all anniversary posts. An occasion for discussion and reflection. Quite relevant today especially considering what the American Left has become.
Marx and Engels saw some quite awful societal conditions to be sure. Much of their critique of the then- existing conditions was justified. That they apparently cared and wanted to help people I’m willing to grant them (since I’ve no way of knowing). Unfortunately, their prescription for cure wound up ( in other peoples’ hands) enslaving over a billion people abd murdering maybe 100 million of them. Meanwhile, capitalism cured most of its ills and today provided workers with more opportunities and a much higher standard of living than ever seen in all
Of human history. What we can best learn from Engels today is that some members of the much- maligned top one percent / economic elite turn into communists. In their cases, I believe their primary motivation is not “social justice” (sic) as may have been Engels’ motive. Since there’s almost no more oppressed and exploited downtrodden masses yearning to breath free anymore, any claim
Of a “social justice” motive is belied. These billionaires like Soroznazi and and Pelousy and some GOPe “never trumpets” and Bloomberg are just (mis-) using that Olde pied piper’s tune to garner more power abd control for themselves ( not that they need it! It’s obviously an addictive sickness with them is all). We must protect what we have (our hard- fought liberty, opportunities, prosperity, etc) from these dangerous “millionaire communists” and the Islamic murder gangs infiltrating or invading our societies
Not to mention the fact that they thought countries were the greatest amount of capitalist development would be the most ripe for a worker’s revolution. But it actually took hold in non industrialized peasant countries like Russia and China (where a cadre of elites could easily fool the masses).
“with the greatest amount”
Engels was very rich, but founded and financed the communist government. The original predecessor of the current liberal oligarchs.
The communist movement was started using money extracted from the poor workers in his factories. Without his money, Marx would starve to death.
If you wonder why some of the present day oligarchs are so leftist, look at Engels. Living with their dichotomy of the high life and funding causes which would destroy it.
That’s pronounced “Froaderick Ang-les”.
interesting, yes.
(some advanced countries have adopted some pretty strong socialism, however, and even USA had adopted a lot of it and may even be headed for more ... so...we haven’t proven to be completely immune ...)
“Your point in posting?”
Why would you ask that?
Because think if you want a conversation you should comment on a point.
https://fineartamerica.com/featured/marx-engels-lenin-stalin-and-mao-chinese-school.html
Communist movement heros!
Moreover, anyone who thinks that somehow socialism is different from communism and for that reason somehow acceptable, should be warned that socialism is only different from Communism in degree, not kind, and that it was Vladimir Lenin who once stated "The goal of socialism is communism."
Unfortunately, the philosophies of people like Engels, Marx and others were merely extensions of their own disgraceful lives. Karl Marx, who refused to work in order to support his family, mostly lived off of the largesse of others - including his own mother - and for that reason has been well nicknamed "Marx the moocher."
Simply politics that started this movement. Post industrial revolution Europe created a new economy and masses of poor urban factory workers that had no advocate. Smart people these Marxist scum....offering Europe untouchables exactly what they wanted. If it weren’t for Truman and Marshall, Europe would’ve have ceded to them post WW2
What the elitist Marxist scum did was to exploit the problems of society and even exaggerate them - not with a view to solving the problems - but with a view to seizing power. Marxists - i.e. our own radical Marxist left - need the problems as their "raison d'etre." Where there are none, the Marxists create them.
Ever hear of "agitation?" This is a strategy in which the Marxists cause trouble by successfully persuading certain groups of people that they are "getting a raw deal," and that certain other groups of people are to blame. This is the essence of the so-called "class struggle." The Marxists portray themselves as "saviors and "liberators" of the "oppressed" class.
Thanks to Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci, Marxism today has evolved from the Marxism of yore. Cultural Marxism came to town when the "Frankfurt School" fled Nazi Germany and set up shop at Columbia University.
Since then, the "class struggle" is no longer necessarily confined to the sphere of economics. Especially not since "Critical Theory" oozed out of academia into the real world. And when you stop to think about it, what is "Critical Theory" but a more malignant form of the "Class Struggle" that is increasingly metastatizing into our culture and poisoning it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.