2020 Election: Could Trump’s claims have merit? An analysis of voting data from Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Data Source: New York Times and Edison Research

Thread Reader ^ | 11/26/2020 | Elliott Anderson

[SeekAndFind]

An analysis of voting data from Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

Data Source: New York Times and Edison Research.

2/ METHODS🚨

Before diving in to the specific data, I wanted to provide samples of the graphs I have put together to show examples of states with clear victories for each of the candidates. These graphs make it easier to notice anomalies in other states.

3/ BIDEN WIN🚨

Let’s start with Minnesota.



Votes after election day should be randomly sampled votes received by mail and the percentage of votes for a specific candidate should stay roughly constant. Here you can see Biden received roughly 54% of all votes after election day.

4/ TRUMP WIN🚨

Here is Florida.

Here there is a gradual slant where Biden goes from receiving around 50% of the votes to receiving around 48%, but there is no gap in reporting and it stays consistent until the counting is complete.

5/ SWING STATES IN QUESTION🚨

For this analysis I am going to be focusing specifically on four states: Wisconsin, Georgia, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. All four of these states have some things in common.

6/ WISCONSIN🚨

I have highlighted one of the Bubbles orange and added an orange arrow to illustrate how abnormal this batch is. This batch contained nearly 170,000 votes and 85% of them went to Biden, but Biden's largest margins were 75.5% in Dane county and 70% in Milwaukee.

7/ WISCONSIN🚨

When you chart the percentage of votes counted as the x axis you can get an idea of how many votes were already counted at this point. The answer is 96.6%. Why did counting stop around 97% and then two hours later this massive influx of new Biden votes came in?

8/ MICHIGAN🚨

Similar to Wisconsin, vote counting stopped during the night, and then a huge batch of votes came in. 96% of the votes went to Biden and he netted around 141,000 votes. A 96% batch of votes seems improbable because Biden's top county in Michigan was won by 72%.

9/ MICHIGAN🚨

From this point on, the percentage of votes coming in for Biden shifted too (see the orange arrow). Also, like Wisconsin, this batch came in after most of the votes had already been counted (85% in this case).

10/ GEORGIA🚨

Similarly in Georgia, a huge batch came in in the middle of the night mostly for Biden (the vertical blue spike around 1AM corresponding to the orange bubble). Another oddity, after election night every batch of votes favored Biden (no bubbles bottom of chart).

11/ GEORGIA🚨

At 1 AM on election night, 93% of the votes were already counted, and then the big Biden spike of votes came in. Over the next 2 days, the percentage of votes in each batch skewed more and more towards Biden for the final 5% of votes.

12/ PENNSYLVANIA🚨

Pennsylvania also had a stop in counting along with a big batch of votes going to Biden in the middle of the night and then a gradual shift of the returned votes towards Biden until 3 days later when he was declared the winner.

13/ PENNSYLVANIA🚨

It is certainly interesting that as soon as Pennsylvania stopped counting (at around 78% of the votes), the remaining votes shifted progressively in Biden’s favor similar to Georgia. From 45% to 50.5%. I am not sure how this can be explained naturally.

14/ ALL FOUR STATES🚨

▶️Stopped counting votes on the night of the election
▶️Had vote surges for Biden in the middle of the night
▶️Had shifts in the percentage of votes being counted towards Biden after the election and after 90% or more of the votes had already been counted

15/ MAIL-IN BALLOTS🚨

If the mail-in ballots counted post-election were mostly for Biden he would have received over 50% of counted votes in these batches, but that was not the case until *after* the counting was stopped. This is suspicious to me.

16/ CONCLUSION 🚨

The odds of all four states exhibiting similar strange behaviors and shifts in how many votes were counted for Biden over time seem improbable if this was not somehow coordinated.

Source:fsociety.substack.com/p/2020-electio…

[Varsity Flight]

So what your clearly demonstrating, is the lesser populated counties must be clearly statistically SKEWERED (majorly SKEWERED) for final totals approaching 85% going for the Fraud-Elect and Thieves.

[MAGAthon]

Trump won.

Tweet: Team Trump - 5h ago
WATCH: Crowd gasps after finding out that a mysterious spike of votes in Pennsylvania had 600,000 votes for Biden and only 3,200 for
@realDonaldTrump
VIDEO 1m26s
https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1331680682578501632?s=09

24 Nov: Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020
A Quantitative Analysis of Decisive Vote Updates in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia on and after Election Night
by Vote Integrity
Executive Summary
In the early hours of November 4th, 2020, Democratic candidate Joe Biden received several major “vote spikes” that substantially — and decisively — improved his electoral position in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia. Much skepticism and uncertainty surrounds these “vote spikes.”...

The four vote updates in question are:

1.An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump

2.An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump

3.A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump

4.An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump...
https://votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anomalies-2020

[madison10]

Michigan was having problems overcoming the landslide. 😳

[djf]

Thanks for posting this in it’s entirety.

[cranked]

Watch —> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vz487c8Dfhk

[MHGinTN]

Is it the education system that has caused so many to not be able to comprehend what you pointed out? I wonder ... there is an evil spirit behind all this.

[tired&retired]

Excellent Summary

[ScholarWarrior]

Yes. For years.

[tired&retired]

Current Status per Associated Press
Biden - 306
Trump - 232

Pennsylvania - 20
Georgia - 16
Michigan - 16
Wisconsin - 10
Total of 4 states - 62 electoral votes

Revised Status
Biden - 244
Trump - 294

[tinyowl]

".. it’s like people on the ground were running one scam while another group ran the data scam, with no communication between them."

“I've got a pen, and I've got a phone,”

[PGalt]

Thanks for posting.

[palmer]

(Michigan) Similar to Wisconsin, vote counting stopped during the night, and then a huge batch of votes came in.

Counting did not stop durnig in Detroit durnig the night. They counted all night according to a sworn affadavit by a Republican observer describing the irregularities. If we are fighting fraud we need to read primary sources and understand the fraud.

[palmer]

Know why it takes several days or even longer to count much fewer votes?

There are well-documented instances of the fraud starting well before election including harvesting, coercion, and ballot alteration. Also it depends on the activity. Tabulating on election day is instant in many locations (happens when the voter feeds his ballot into the tabulator. Mail-in votes have to be removed from the envelopes and tabulated. Fraud took place at those times as well, but the reason for the delay can be explained.

[mo]

the really important thing about that analysis, is that it should automatically take the issue out of the states hands and courts.

It obviously is an external assault upon those states=-making it a Federal issue

[Recovering Ex-hippie]

At the top it says this is from The New York Times research what?

The New York Times did I read that correctly

[DNME]

Any chance they might look at states ”without” any vote count controversy, in case the ballot stuffing worked there without being noticed?

The above analysis, while excellent, suggests that Trump wins by far less that the epic blowout we’ve been told about. I want the Dems to lose by so much that their grandchildren are afraid to run for office!

[9YearLurker]

Pretty weak question and conclusion, given all the statistically evidence there is—let alone the on-the-ground and electronic evidence.

[djf]

Bump!
So people can see what we’re dealing with!

[Pearfect]

There needs to be a COMPLETE INVESTIGATION INTO THE 2020 election.

This does NOT MAKE SENSE.

WE CANNOT TRUST OUR ELECTIONS ANYMORE.

[linMcHlp]

bttt