Turley: Third Circuit decision on 2nd Amendment “perfectly tailored” for Supreme Court after Barrett confirmation

hotair.com ^ | 11/25/2020 | Ed Morrissey

[2aProtectsTheRest]

Guns, knives, cars, and other dangerous objects are readily available in the outside world. If someone is too dangerous to be trusted with a firearm, they’re too dangerous to be trusted with a car, a knife, or the ability to walk around in public.

If they’re not too dangerous to have access to cars and knives, they’re not too dangerous to have access to firearms. The mental gymnastics you have to do to justify why someone is safe enough to be let out in public, but too dangerous to own or possess a firearm could win a gold medal at the Olympic Games. Are they dangerous or not? Pick one!

[CurlyDave]

I was just thinking, if the govt. could get away with requiring auto weapons to be licensed and require a costly stamp, what’s to prevent them from doing the same thing with semi autos?

That is exactly what Biden and Harris, especially the ho, want to do.

The only thing that might stand between us and them is the Senate if we win at least one of the Georgia runoffs, and hopefully both.

[ThanhPhero]

The 2Amd has no exception for ex felons of any sort, or for any other individual. The 13th probably does create an exception for incarcerated persons. The wording of the 2Amd renders ALL extant laws re: firearms and other arms unConstitutional.

[MileHi]

This court needs to address what the words “shall not be infringed” mean.

This would address prior felons, so-called class 3 restrictions and, really, most gun laws.