Posted on 11/25/2020 5:39:59 AM PST by all the best
Man who discovered Eric Coomer Dominion Voting's Director of Strategy and Security and hardcore antifa. Promised his comrades Trump would not win.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
btt
just because you say something like this doesn’t mean you do it. Unless there is proof that this guy actually took action and made changes to affect an outcome, this is not even worth looking at.
Lefties are real defensive about this. “HE SAID STUFF IN PRIVATE!”
No, Facebook is not private.
You are correct, don’t even look at this. Just take this guy out back and put a bullet in his temple. 1 down hundreds to go.
Reminds you of Peter Strzok doesn't it?
Does Joe have a recording of the meeting?
“Everybody needs to see and hear this.”
Not really. Why? Anyone here on this site knows the election was filled with fraud on an industrial scale. The election was stolen.
So, one of the bad actors is caught bragging about election theft. So? What shall we do call the FBI?! That’s funny. Contact your Congress person? Ha! Contact your Senator, funnier still.
Ok, here’s my point, none of this will ever matter until we fix the school system. Right now, the school system is churning out millions of people who believe only what their TV tells them, and if they were honest, they’d say they are glad that “wise people from the government” stole this election and made things “right”.
Look to the schools, fix the schools, or this will be the story until the country collapses.
"its funny how many different ways liberals spin things" - Also You
The only way is to make an example of dealing with this guy what puts the fear if God in the rest of the scum
“The only way is to make an example of dealing with this guy what puts the fear if God in the rest of the scum”
Vigilante? I’ll pass. This all sucks, but I’m pretty sure jail sucks more.
And your point? I’m not defending a douchebag like this guy. I’m saying that logically, you MUST have proof or you are no better than a libtard who thinks up is down or the sky is red. I’m very sorry you didn’t understand that and had to have it spelled out for you.
just because you say something like this doesn’t mean you do it. Unless there is proof that this guy actually took action and made changes to affect an outcome, this is not even worth looking at.
There will never be any proof if there is no investigation. This guy should have been waterboarded in public by the GOP Senate. That’s what Democrats would do if the tables were turned.
Have to disagree.....
We have a crime...
He prior admitted to wanting to commit the crime...
He had access, motive, and opportunity.....
There is enough to charge him once it is shown there was electronic manipulation.
Yep, let’s not even try to stop this coup. We need to try to fix the school system so many in a generation or so things will be better.
Fight now or forget it.
“Fight now or forget it.”
Oh, right, I forgot “FIGHT”!!!!
So, if I type fight, and urge others to fight, and maybe even put fight in bold, or in caps, or in super large text, that will do it.
I keep seeing people urging me to not give up and to fight. Fight what? Urge people to “fight” without a plan of action is just plain stupid.
Fixing the schools is real. If people begin to turn their attention to the local indoctrination centers and get involved. Get into the PTA, get elected to the school board, object to the radicalization of our kids, we have a chance, down the road. Ignore the schools and we’ll bitch and moan, and die off, and they will win.
“Have to disagree.....
We have a crime...
He prior admitted to wanting to commit the crime...
He had access, motive, and opportunity.....”
We also have what appears to be the criminal results that confirm the intent of his statements.
I agree that access, motive, and opportunity are all reasons for an investigation. If i were his defense attorney, in court, before the jury and judge, I’d ask: “Ok, so you’ve established that he had access, motive, and opportunity. How did he do it? What did he do, specifically, to alter the election?” You better have the evidence that he either gave orders to someone else to set the stage, or he did it himself. Without that evidence the jury will not convict and neither will the judge. Those things- access, motive, and opportunity, are all circumstantial evidence. Proof is what gets the conviction.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.