[AndyTheBear]

Going to defer to Robert Barnes take on Powell. She is right about the election being stolen, but she is not an expert on election procedures and is following a false narrative of how it is being stolen.

[MHGinTN]

Well then, how about you clue us rubes in on what the narrative should be?

[ocrp1982]

“Going to defer to Robert Barnes take on Powell. She is right about the election being stolen, but she is not an expert on election procedures and is following a false narrative of how it is being stolen.”
And, just what are Barnes’s credentials in reference to election laws and procedures? What exactly makes him an ultimate authority on this subject? Please elaborate on his specific expertise in these areas.

[doc maverick]

And the false narrative is?

[kara37]

Going to defer to Robert Barnes take on Powell.

***********************************

I read Robert Barnes too. However, I noticed that there hasn’t been one lawyer he hasn’t criticized, including ACB.

[UpInArms]

False narrative? Are you serious? You must not be aware of the vote dumps and the analysis of the reported vote tabulations. At a minimum, these show stealing. The data is out there and it’s in the numbers that do not lie. There is clear fraud.

[erkelly]

And what makes Robert Barnes an elections expert? How does he know what Ms. Powell does or does not know? I suspect Ms. Powell has had a crash course in election law and procedures.

[erkelly]

And what makes Robert Barnes an elections expert? How does he know what Ms. Powell does or does not know? I suspect Ms. Powell has had a crash course in election law and procedures.

[InterceptPoint]

She is right about the election being stolen, but she is not an expert on election procedures and is following a false narrative of how it is being stolen.
+++++
You are really spot on that comment. My reasons for saying so may be different from yours but I feel strongly that neither Trump nor Sydney have put a technical team together that is capable of uncovering the what, when, where,,how and especially the how many..

I just guessing of course but if such a team existed I find it hard to believe that it’s existence would not have been leaked by now.

But I’m hoping I’m wrong and Sydney shocks us (perhaps) tomorrow with detailed quantitative data that even a Supreme Court judge can understand. And hands the court a persuasive explanation that proves the data is indisputable.

To dream.

[KTM rider]

"Going to defer to Robert Barnes take on Powell. She is right about the election being stolen, but she is not an expert on election procedures and is following a false narrative of how it is being stolen."

so Robert Barnes and every other pundit in the media sitting on their pale patuties cloistered behind computer screens is an expert on election tampering now..OK got it