Two questions. What inside information do you have that leads you to believe her pursuits are ridiculous? Secondly, a general, philosophical question. Can something that is true still be considered a conspiracy theory?
He was watching CNN and they said an insider in the Trump administration told a friend of a friend of the CNN janitor.
Powell is pursuing very complex arguments - how Dominion software works, is it hackable, who uses it, connections with Venezuela, China, Soros. Collecting watertight evidence across such broad field will take a team of investigators a very long time - with the Democrats and every interested party fighting and hiding every step of the way. Its an extreme long-shot.
Meanwhile the clock is ticking on Electoral College certification in 3 weeks
On the other hand, we have now glaring statistical evidence of gross anomalies from a few swing states regarding mail-in ballots, improper handling, no chain of control, dirty voter rolls, no audits of improper voting etc…. There is established electoral law in each state to review these problems and plenty of precedent. Also, the bar is not that high - Trump only needs to show to a court (likely SCOTUS) that enough ballots were corrupted in particular states to make the outcome unclear. If the electors can’t be assigned, then the decision goes to the states legislatures or Congress, where the GOP has an advantage.
No one here knows what Powell has, and I wish her luck - but she's trying to hit grand slams when only a single is needed. Also, her complex theories are muddying the waters in the court of public opinion. its far easier to prove there were unverified ballots in Philadelphia vs. Hugo Chavez’s connection to Dominion.
The guy there lays it out very well. Powell’s wild, zany allegations have effectively undermined the most compelling arguments on Trump’s side.