Posted on 11/22/2020 5:59:17 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
The burden of proof in a criminal case goes in one direction. The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. Otherwise, they are (usually) acquitted. But what the President’s team of lawyers are doing is a series of civil cases. That changes the rules from what most people see on an episode of “Law and Order.”
Let’s take a look at four key points to remember when hearing all of the “bad” news or negative comments on social media.
First and foremost, many are saying that it’s incumbent on the Trump team to prove election fraud. To some extent, this is true. But when validating vote totals and certifying results, it’s also incumbent on election boards, secretaries of state, and electors themselves to prove the votes were accurate whenever there are reasons to believe they were tainted. In 2020, there are tons of reasons to believe the votes were tainted.
By certifying election results, elected officials and bureaucrats are signing their names to the belief that nothing is awry. There are only two reasons governors, secretaries of states, legislators, or other election officials in the contested states would be willing to do this. Either they’re stupid for believing there’s nothing bad that happened and continues to happen in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, Arizona, and other states, or they’re rushing it through because they were involved. Would YOU sign your name to certify these results?
The second thing to keep in mind is that Team Trump does NOT have to demonstrate voter fraud “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Any time anyone proclaims this is necessary, tell them to stop watching “Law and Order.” Again, these are civil cases. Criminal cases require an abundance of evidence to breach...
(Excerpt) Read more at noqreport.com ...
There is ZERO evidence of a free and fair election!
What if Biden doesn’t Concede?
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA...right youu are
Actually though Rucker is brilliant
Mark
The party about to lose the election by razor thin margins in the 11th hour in several states has asked for protection against vote fraud for decades.
The party about to win the election by razor thin margins in the 11th hour insisted vote fraud was rare, isolated and fought increased protections against fraud.
Whether or not the election is skewed by fraud, anyone unwilling to understand why the aggrieved party is skeptical and frustrated is acting in bad faith.
- Jeremiah MacRoberts
This is a good article.
Judge: What is your claim?
Trump’s Attorney: We believe there is irrefutable evidence of voter fraud.
Judge: What is your evidence?
Trump’s Attorney: This district only has 100,000 registered voters but the voter rolls show over 200,000 voted.
Judge: Very good point. Well, defense attorneys, prove there wasn’t voter fraud...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.