Posted on 11/22/2020 11:50:09 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
A group of computer scientists argued in 2016 that Hillary Clinton should have challenged the results in swing states which could have tipped the election in her favor.
New York magazine reported November 22, 2016:
Hillary Clinton is being urged by a group of prominent computer scientists and election lawyers to call for a recount in three swing states won by Donald Trump, New York has learned. The group, which includes voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz and J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, believes they’ve found persuasive evidence that results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or hacked. The group is so far not speaking on the record about their findings and is focused on lobbying the Clinton team in private. …
While it’s important to note the group has not found proof of hacking or manipulation, they are arguing to the campaign that the suspicious pattern merits an independent review — especially in light of the fact that the Obama White House has accused the Russian government of hacking the Democratic National Committee.
The following day, Halderman expanded on his argument via a post on Medium.
“Closer to the election, when it was clear from polling data which states would have close electoral margins, the attackers might spread malware into voting machines in some of these states, rigging the machines to shift a few percent of the vote to favor their desired candidate,” he wrote.
“This malware would likely be designed to remain inactive during pre-election tests, do its dirty business during the election, then erase itself when the polls close. A skilled attacker’s work might leave no visible signs — though the country might be surprised when results in several close states were off from pre-election...
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
She never did because then the corruption, and fraudulent votes cast for her would have been discovered. Couldn’t let that happen.
As I recall, the Clinton campaign did want recounts, until they didn’t as it was showing too much fraud in Clinton’s favor.
She had Jill Stein do it for her. They had to stop when fraud was discovered.
[ She never did because then the corruption, and fraudulent votes cast for her would have been discovered. Couldn’t let that happen. ]
Her “Popular Vote” cannard would have been destroyed and it would have called into question the vote in places like commie fornia and CommieRado.
OMG call a waaambulance
That's right! I remember that now. Thanks for reminding me.
Elections do not matter. Argue about it all you want. They are fixed.
So we shouldn't even try to fight?
I hope you get devoured by the monster first.
That's exactly what the Deep State wants you to believe.
Eff 'em, I won't let them have the satisfaction.
They KNEW the machines could be hacked.
The Left, all of it: MSM, Tech, popular culture, academia, Demoncrat party, fascist ‘antifa’, BLM, et al. are the definition of projection.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.