Posted on 11/22/2020 5:57:47 AM PST by Pollard
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mp0u4dw7GH4
Georgia BOMBSHELL Analysis - BIDEN takes MINIMUM 98% of a 23,487 vote batch at 12:18AM - Impossible!
A single batch of votes goes 98% at minimum to Biden. 115% maximum. The problem with fractional tallies. Good explanation by a young guy. 16 minute video but you'll get the gist in first half.
A parley is Parler’s version of a tweet.
This is something worth showing at a press conference. Leave Rudy home though
Having lived within a 10 mile radius of 02138 my entire life (except for my time in the Armed Forces) I can guarantee that Plugs didn't get 98% of the vote there. He may well have gotten 90% but not 98%.
Has the media provided any rationale for how Biden achieved a record number of votes when he was easily the worst presidential candidate of all time.
Very interesting. The people who were “working” with and on the system Nov 3 and 4 should be able to explain these things. But I am sure they are not available, but if found and are subpoenaed, they will fight the subpoena. Once China Buyden is “installed” this will be old news anyway. This election has changed my skepticism to cynicism. When I learned that the demonkkkraps even did something with voting machines during their primary to block Sanders, I see that that was the trial run, which was perfected in 2018 and 2020. Our country is in great danger.
Yup, a single batch shortly after midnight that was enough for biden to take the state. 98-115% went to biden, depending on how much rounding you do and in which direction on the 0.534 to 0.454 which converts to 53.4 to 45.4
Those three decimals that convert to a single decimal when converted to percentage, is not accurate enough when dealing with almost 200,000 ballots/votes. Any given batch could have been rounded like that or a bunch of them could have been. I suppose the reasoning for fractions is for the stupid fraud prone weighted races. All these things just allow for massaging the numbers.
Now we know why they want to call math racist.
Can’t use edison data to validate vote counts. It is fake news tv feeds and can be manipulated or just fed strangely. refreshed at will. delayed at will. just for the tv drama. sorry it is not real vote counts.
Question on edison data that I have not seen answered anywhere.
Are they manually keying totals at some point in the process?
The reason I ask is there were some “errors” (all in favor of Biden of course) that they claimed were “transcription errors”.
I find it hard to believe they could manually key anything fast enough to keep up with incoming data.
Any idea? Manual or not?
“Has the media provided any rationale for how Biden achieved a record number of votes when he was easily the worst presidential candidate of all time.”
Sure, Trump BAD MAN. He called black women DOGS! Martha McCallum made sure everybody knew that when she and Brett let James Clymer rant on about it the night before the election on the dead Fox network.
I am ashamed to admit I do not understand what he said the data proved
He does, though, show that a large ballot dump after midnight went at least 97% for Biden.
The explanation was not as clear as it needed to be.What he needed to do was methodically build his spreadsheet and then let the spreadsheet tell the tale.
Just the demeanor and tone of voice was persuasive, tho - I didn’t pick up any vibe that he had something to hide. As he noted, you could go over the video as many times as necessary to be able to critique his point.
Thank you
Was he saying the data showed the vote totals are not possible?
He seemed to be saying that the change in the percent of the total vote for Biden took unrealistic leaps, corresponding to Biden getting over 100% of the change in the total, and (IIRC) Trump’s change being negative.
Thanks for explaining.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.