Right now, the lamestream are involved in a full-court press of suppressing news on the Dominion fraud while at the same time gaslighting everyone to become used to 'president elect' Biden. Don't watch it.
Sidney will have her day in court. And I pray that the kind of evidence she will have will be text/email communications between the conspirators on election night directing how many ballots needed to be manufactured and trucked in to which precincts.
I pray that out of the differing versions of the German server stories, the best one will emerge: Trump has the servers and they show the original vote count which gave it to him by a landslide.
I have a couple of weeks left to dream...
Joe diGenova ow on Newsmax with his wife Victoria Toensing. They are always great. It's on the Chris Salcedo show. Sidney POwell was on last night at 9:15 eastern she was terrific again.
We need to feature Newsmax more and drivebys less.
Sunday Morning Futures is great, but since I’m boycotting Faux News, I wish she was on NewsMax... Oh well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-AZV3qnwkA
JFK on Secret Societies | “The President and the Press” Speech (Full) HD
[May 29, 1917 - November 22, 1963]
Only one Sunday Morning News Program to watch...Maria Bartiromo on FNC, Sunday Morning Futures. It is the only show viewed on FNC these days!!! Newsmax & Oann now rule cable news. Trumpie is hunting out a cable news station to acquire!!! When that happens.....CNN, MSNBC will close their doors!!! These networks better pray the the SCOTUS rules that the Congress shall select our POTUS & it will be Trump!!! Either way, Trumpie wipe out the Cable Fake News!!!
My wife and I are 80 years old we have never owned a fire arm in all of our lives and have no intention to own any now. Last evening we were invited over to one of our kids house for dinner with some of our grown grand children. There are a total of 30 folks in our immediate family, not including my wife & I. My son-in-law informed my wife and I that all thirty of them, guys & gals have purchased weapons (Pistol Guns) and have attended training courses on how to use them safely while protecting themselves from attack!!! Reason, the local & federal government might no longer be protecting any Americans at all!!!
My wife & I also believe, and we are deathly afraid, that if Joe Biden becomes POTUS.....Civil war is just around the corner!!! SAD days for the American people and beloved nation republic are about to fall on the actions of ignorant fools!!! Some of us Americans see this deadly, conflict coming, some Americans are dumb & blind to reality!!! Once again...SAD lawless days coming to the & for the USA!! the statue of Liberty is openly crying!!!
The claim is that the virus, covid 19, is mutating and that the vaccine may not be all that effective. Especially, when another one is released which is a very real possibility.
Bottom line we never closed down the economy or placed unrealistic mandates on citizens for the flu. Especially a flu that has the following characteristics: The media keeps using the Johns Hopkins phony stats that claim 250k+ have been killed by covid. The real number accd. to the CDC which had to acknowledge that 94% of the readings on the testing done came in false positive, is more like 15,000.This due to corona. The rest due to natural types of deaths from heart attacks,cancer, car accidents,numerous other medical conditions all of which have been allocated to covid which makes the stats even more bogus than ever.
Kristi Noem of South Dakota,our next VP or potus candidate in 2024, is not in favor of mandating masks. One doctor on Newsmax, about ten minutes ago, likened wearing masks as trying to prevent mosquitoes coming through a chain link fence.
Okay, I already programmed Maria Bartiromo for recording, as for the propaganda: nope!
https://twitter.com/justin_hart/status/1330261324119633923
From a freerepublic thread last night
I hope this spreads like a wild fire.
Folks standing up for their rights
Buffalo NY small business owners meet to discuss COVID closure.
Public health shows up.
Public Health and Sheriff’s asked to leave a private meeting
D talking heads and network hosts (but I repeat myself) this morning are continually pumping 39+ cases thrown out / laughed out of court so far.
They ignore the fact that most challenges are in swing states run by Ds, and evidence hasn’t been fully assembled, or presented.
Attitudes and smiles on MSM mugs will change this week.
Can you decipher all this?
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/when_is_a_perfect_oval_evidence_of_vote_fraud.html
First, let’s talk about the elephant in the room, Dr. Eric Coomer. Recognize that name? In this video, Coomer comes across as a consummate professional, knowing hundreds of thousands of dollars are on the line. In my professional experience, it was a very good demo highlighting the capabilities and features of the hardware and software that Dominion Voting Systems sells. As he walks through his measured and informational demo, you would never know the alleged radical and hateful conservative contempt kicking around in the back of his head. So rather than dismiss Mr. Coomer outright, let me present some information that has been hiding in plain sight in what is otherwise an unremarkable video. Given the propensity for technocrats to scuttle damaging info, I am surprised Google hasn’t memory holed this item, nor has Dominion has requested a takedown.
The presentation takes an interesting turn when Dr. Coomer presents the Imagecast Evolution Ballot Marking Device (BMD) at the 15:00 mark. It functions as an all- in-one (votes, tabulates, and prints the ballot) and Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) solution as well. ADA voters get a blank ballot to insert and the voter can use any ADA compliant input device attached to the unit or use the device itself. An internal printer marks the ballot for the voter and directly deposits into the ballot collection box. At the 18:30 mark, David Marino states the following (emphasis added)
Something important, uh, on these marks that are created on the ballot is we have a huge library of handmade marks so it’s not a perfect oval that you are going to be able to identify that that was a mark by a machine. But it’s, it’s ah, it’s a library of different random hand marks that looks like somebody else used a Sharpie to vote the ballot. So you are never going to be able to say this is ah, a ballot voted by the accessible uh voter, this is a ballot voted by a person with a Sharpie for example, for, with the mark.
Dr. Coomer follows immediately with:
Yeah, again it’s all about preserving voter anonymity, um you know if, if you only have one or two disabled voters in a given precinct an if you’re using standard marking techniques where they’re, uh uh an exact perfect fill of that oval um you would be able to uh distinguish that ballot from somebody that just hand marked it. So this is one of those further steps that we do um to preserve that anonymity.
A library of different random marks to avoid a ballot appearing differently from hand marked ballots becomes more critical considering the next segment of his presentation. In other words, their system prints electronically cast ballots that cannot be differentiated from a hand marked ballot.
Let’s move on to the next item of note, the image audit mark. Dr. Coomer continues (emphasis added):
The other key thing here is what I haven’t talked about, so obviously we take an image of every ballot cast, front and back, but we also have what’s called the audit mark. That’s part of the image and it is a text record of how the scanner actually counted that ballot when it was scanned. So it shows here (points to the number on the image), and there’s, there’s a variety of information that’s included on that. It shows which tabulator it was scanned on, which batch it was created in, and for the ICC (ImageCast Central), because it’s central, it actually gives you the number of the ballot within, within the stack. We do the same uh audit mark creation on the precinct uh devices, but we don’t, we don’t index the paper, again for voter anonymity.
Dr. Coomer shows an audit mark contiguous to the image of a scanned ballot that indicates a blank vote because the voter circled the candidate names. He makes digital checkmarks of voter intent in the correct spot and adjudicates the ballot on screen, thus updating the audit mark but the original audit mark is not erased. So an adjudicator, on-screen, could divine whatever intent, update the ballot which adds a new audit mark, then move on to the next ballot. All of this happens with a screen and mouse editing an image record but alters the image of the ballot and the audit trail. A digital version of divining the hanging chad, if you will. The remainder is somewhat interesting as he continues with a summary of audit features for recounts, candidate views, and risk-limiting statistical sampling. However, the products he presents are all tied to one election system and did describe their overseas ballot portal for military voters as well.
As I mentioned, let’s not rush to dismiss Dr. Coomer’s remarks outright, let’s learn from the publically available information he has shared and compare that against BMD auditability. As recently as September of this year, a fascinating article was published in the Election Law Journal Volume 19, Number 3 (note: paywall) regarding BMD’s such as the one mentioned above in Dominion’s presentation. The abstract states:
Voters can make mistakes in expressing their intent in either technology, but only BMDs are also subject to hacking, bugs, and misconfiguration of the software that prints the marked ballots. Most voters do not review BMD-printed ballots, and those who do often fail to notice when the printed vote is not what they expressed on the touchscreen. Furthermore, there is no action a voter can take to demonstrate to election officials that a BMD altered their expressed votes, nor is there a corrective action that election officials can take if notified by voters—there is no way to deter, contain, or correct computer hacking in BMDs. These are the essential security flaws of BMDs.
Risk-limiting audits can ensure that the votes recorded on paper ballots are tabulated correctly, but no audit can ensure that the votes on paper are the ones expressed by the voter on a touchscreen: Elections conducted on current BMDs cannot be confirmed by audits. We identify two properties of voting systems, contestability and defensibility, necessary for audits to confirm election outcomes. No available BMD certified by the Election Assistance Commission is contestable or defensible.
There is a double-edged sword to technology that mimics hand marking for the sake of anonymity. I am terribly curious to hear if any ballots in the statistically impossible contested ballot dumps have perfect standard oval marks where Dominion’s library of hand marks was used? Could the thieves have outsmarted themselves? Were the adjudicators relying solely on Dominion’s adjudication ballot recognition software that fails to detect anomalies while rushing through ballot images too fast to tell anything was amiss? Can Dominion’s software correctly distinguish fraudulent ballots that are too perfect? All in the name of voter anonymity. Are we certain the fraud is not anonymous as well? Time will tell.
Romney’s and Soros’ Wallass (KNOWINGLY lying):
“There is not a shred of evidence that there
is (any election fraud).”
So here is what actually happened in Germany from those who know,actually not far at all from what we have been claiming.
Actually we can chalk one oup for BD/paul Furber since he called it a week or so ago.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3908532/posts
The courageous, brilliant duo of Sidney Powell and Congressman Louis Gohmert stirred up a bit of a storm in the last few days with this tweet (L. Ghomert tweets about Scytl server raided in Germany)
When I saw this it did not make sense. Let me explain. I spent four years working at State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism (now it is the Bureau of Counter Terrorism). I was one of two officers who dealt directly with the FBI in the investigation of the terrorist bombing of Pan Am 103. I learned through this experience that US law enforcement cannot operate in other countries without the permission of those countries.
I also spent 22 years scripting terrorism exercises for U.S. military special operations. My job was to replicate State Department and Embassy communications that would occur during a terrorist crisis. So, I have a lot of experience in working real world with US law enforcement, US military and our Embassies in sorting out the issues that arise when the United States wants to pursue a law enforcement or military operation in a foreign country.
The U.S. Army did not conduct a raid in Germany on either Sctyl or Dominion offices or servers. They are foreign nationals and we must operate in accordance with German law. Moreover, the U.S. Army does not have law enforcement powers with respect to such entities.
So what happened? I am reliably informed that a unit under the command of USEUCOM (i.e., United States European Command) did in fact conduct an operation to take control of computer servers. But these servers belong to the CIA, not Dominion or Sctyl. The U.S. military has full authority to do this because any CIA activity in the European theater is being conducted using military cover. In other words, CIA officers would be identified to the German government (and anyone else asking) as military employees or consultants.
Such an operation would have been carried out with U.S. law enforcement present to take custody of the evidence. That means that the evidence will be under the control of the Department of Justice through US Attorneys and can be used in court or other judicial proceedings.
This is not the first time that a military unit attached to EUCOM has compelled a CIA computer facility to hand over evidence. A dear friend of mine (a retired DEA officer) told me about an incident where he entered a CIA facility in Frankfurt backed up by the US Army to get info the CIA was withholding (this took place in the 1980s).
I also have confirmed what Jim Hoft reported the other night–the CIA’s Gina Haspel was not informed in advance of this operation. Based on this fact, I think it is correct that action was taken in Germany on territory under U.S. control and that a CIA facility was targeted.
I also have learned that FBI Director Christopher Wray was excluded from this operation. Wray, more than Haspel, has been working aggressively to undermine and sabotage Donald Trump. This means that some other U.S. law enforcement agency (e.g., US Marshals, DEA, Secret Service, etc) had the lead in collecting the evidence.
Sidney Powell is a serious lawyer. She is not going to make a false claim. Period. She embodies honesty and integrity. Given her recent statements on Maria Bartoromo and Lou Dobbs and Eric Bolling, she clearly knows that evidence is being collected that will prove beyond reasonable doubt (i.e., the type of evidence required to obtain a criminal conviction) that the CIA had some sort of nefarious relationship with Dominion Software and that Dominion Software was being used abroad and in the United States to conduct voter fraud.
I fully expect CIA officials to argue they had no idea that Dominion was engaged in such nefarious activity. Their denial carries as much weight as the claim by Captain Louis Renault in the iconic scene in Casablanca:
Capt. Louis Renault: I am shocked, shocked that there is gambling going on in here. Waiter: Sir here are your winnings The coup attempt to dethrone Donald Trump continues.
