Posted on 11/21/2020 5:18:32 AM PST by chrisnj
Please watch this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGiN_JWv7WI
MI residents are gems We owe this women for her courage.God Bless her.
WOW! Everybody should watch this. Thank you for posting.
Then notice the enemedia hyenas questions were traps set to discredit her as a Trump partisan. This is a battle of powers and principalities.
Good post worth watching indeed.
And I’m in before the FR defeatist trolls.
She shouldn’t have voted to certify the election. She shouldn’t have allowed herself to be driven by fear to do that. It was wrong. For other readers here, by the way, that’s a link to the Fox News channel at YouTube.
So, her original (or the election board’s) legal council told her she did not have discretion to vote no.
Gov. Whitmer (D) was a party to swinging her to a yes vote, by dangling an independent audit of questionable precincts. She wanted that in writing.
The D vice-chair (how appropriate a title) then spoke with each board member privately, then regrouped and did it as a motion, but the Zoom was muted during that motion process and the public couldn’t hear it (how convenient).
After the meeting, the D board secretary said on TV that anything done with that motion was non-binding. So, that’s what the D vice-chair told each of the other board members privately: “Support the motion and she’ll vote yes on the counts, but the motion won’t stand.”
PDJT needs to reopen Standish (MI) max prison for these traitors.
This intelligent woman may likely enter politics now, as do many that have been personally threatened and harmed by D’rats, and soon become a major thorn to Detroit D’rats.
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
Hang tough girl.. It’s going to take people like these 2 to stand tough and force the audit. And hoping it’s before they can “fix” the ballots. They just want to push this through.
“She shouldn’t have voted to certify the election.”
Why don’t ya watch the video? It explains why she voted yes. She was conned by the vice-chair (in collusion with Gov. Whitmer), using a bs motion, that an audit of questionable precincts would happen.
“Conned?” She was trained to know better. I’ve been in worse situations than that with real criminals in the same kind of neighborhood, and I didn’t back down. That was because I was a *man*. She should have left the job to a man.
I’m proud of her for showing integrity, courage and how she conducted herself in that interview.
She stated that her choice to vote no was met with accusations of racism and later threats to herself and family. As someone who reads/watches way too much news - it always seems that the left is making such accusations and threats. That’s all they’ve got, no rational arguments or civility, just the end justifying the means. It’s a damn shame where we are in this country.
She was in a high-pressure, high-visibility, big-outcome legal situation. She had legal council tell her wrong. She was under personal attack by ‘the village’. She had a deal she thought worked (but was a lie).
I can only imagine how a parent feels when their beloved children are threatened with harm at the hands of strangers. I pray that I, and you, FRiend, will never know it.
The man switched his vote, too. No?
Oh yes! Yes yes yes!
There you are......a man’s man.........mighty and smart beyond most.
You have engaged tougher bad a$$es before, of course.
All from your comfy chair........another arm chair warrior speaks!
I bet you wipe using sandpaper (heavy grit).
Come on, tell us your Corn Pop story.
We wait.
She rescinded her vote to certify, did she not? As did the other Republican canvasser?
So you like drama. You should consider turning off the television and going straight, boy.
Counsel.
Excellent, highly logical post in every other respect. Well done.
Well, if that ain't Post of the Day, it's certainly in the top 2. :-)
There was no way for them to rescind their votes.
Correct. She and the man voted No first, to certifying.
Then, they got the board attacks, family threats and bogus motion (in cohoots with Gov. Whitmer, that an audit of questionable precincts would be done), and both switched to Yes. Certainly under duress.
Then, a D’rat board member said on TV that night that the moved action wouldn’t happen.
Then, they switched back to No votes, killing certification.
But I’m confused. Maybe I’m thinking of another county or state? It’ll be embarrassing, but I’ll admit to it if that’s the case. Been under enormous stress on the work front lately.
All I know is, there were 4 canvassers (2 Republicans and 2 Democrats). One of the Democrat canvassers made threats against the Republican canvasser, and actually made a video of himself doing it. The 2 Republicans then rescinded/took back their votes to certify. I didn’t keep up with what happened after that, so I don’t know the final outcome.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.