Posted on 11/20/2020 5:49:50 AM PST by BuckeyeGW
Sidney Powell, an attorney on President Trump's election legal team, shot back at Fox News host Tucker Carlson the morning after he said she "got angry" and refused to provide evidence on his show for her claims of voting software flipping votes.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
I have to say we have lately discovered some VERY smart, principled and strong women rising. Amy Coney Barrett and Sydney Powell are two shining examples.
These are the highly accomplished, American women young girls can use as their role models as they grow up.
Fox News host gets angry and provides no evidence that a guest got angry and provided no evidence of what she was invited to talk about other than dozens of sworn affidavits. Know-it-all FReeper tells readers, "So much of what Tucker Carlson alleges is baseless and untrue."
Et tu, Tucker?
Tucker is an a$$ but hey, he was a dude that wore a bowtie until he was 35....
However Sydney Powell does zero service for the cause by battling the nitwit, just focus on the election theft please.
We don’t need to respond to everything, and we certainly don’t need to respond to “Friedly fire” so to speak. We have more important stuff to worry about then hurt feelings.
ha! I hated the bow tie, and have not really paid attention to Tuck. Too bad.
Yeahbut, this spat may get through to normies, who do not know massive vote fraud occurred.
Tucker is now compromised ... remember the stolen package ...
I’ll be the minority here.
We spent years waiting for Sessions, Barr and Durham. Our hopes were raised and Conservatives were certain there was going to be indictments etc. Promises that failed to deliver.
I’ll wait to see what she does produce before I make a judgment on what Tucker said.
Tucker is now compromised ... remember the stolen package ...
At this time, being a “centrist” is a luxury we don’t have.
Choose a side!
The bottom line is that the software or server theories are easy to disprove and are very likely a big waste of time. As many people have pointed out, they recounted fraudulent ballots in Georgia. Signatures were not checked. There was no audit of the poll books. There was no forensic inspection of ballots. The machine and hand counts were counting the same fraudulent ballots and they matched (unless the SoS theory is true).
We shouldn’t be so quick to eat our own. Especially when it’s so easy just to sit on one’s ass on the sidelines.
She is the President’s lawyer. It’s not her job to do Tucker’s job. FNC is just like the Deep State. They have no interest in gathering their own facts that may support POTUS.
Sidney just put the last nail in FOX’S coffin😄💥
I think Tucker got the freedom to continue to say what he wanted on his show, but had to agree to do the bidding of the kingpins at Fox when they wanted. They REALLY wanted to find out exactly what evidence Sidney has, so they got Tucker to go after it. Sidney didn’t bite....which gives me more confidence in her than ever.
Tucker’s going to get sea sick, he’s going to sink so fast. Why the heck would Trump’s lawyer open up her case before a Fox host? She’d have to be a nitwit.
Chatsworth Osbourne Jr.
To use hyperbole - there was no place for a “centrist” in late 30’s Nazi Germany in the debate between the Jewish point of view and the Nazi point of view. The middle ground was not the “high” ground.
And, the hyperbole not withstanding, that is where the US is today. The middle ground is the lowest ground of all.
Never trust a man who wears a bow-tie.
Can’t believe all the cr@p coming Tucker’s way here.
He is quite literally one of the last few shining conservative truth telling stars out there.
Maybe the guy is pissed, our Country is being ripped from it’s foundations by lying, cheating progressives and he just had a bad day?!?!!?!!?!!
Is FR being hacked by antifa or something??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.