Posted on 11/14/2020 4:59:48 PM PST by blueplum
Palin responded to comments in Obama's A Promised Land during a Friday evening interview with Newsmax. Both she and host Greg Kelly ridiculed Obama as "aloof and snobby as he's ever been" after he tied her to what he described as xenophobic and paranoid thinking that now dominates the Republican Party...
...Palin said Obama's depiction of her in his new book overlooks that she and the Tea Party movement at the time promoted diversity within the GOP, particularly the "Mama Grizzlies" embrace of conservative women.
"It's the antithesis of what the left is acting out today. They're choosing people based on gender, based on race, they're creating inequality, when we're saying, 'We can all be a part of this,' changing this country into something we can all embrace," she said.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...
I'm sure China and Russia will love it, tho, especially China.
Kristi Noem stood up for Palin against Bronc0’s lame assessments.
McCain voted for Obama. Change my mind.
First order of business is to hold every GOP Politician accountable for their support of Trump. Those that didn’t, get primaried out.
Barry’s Book of Whining
Malcontent 0genderX is a sorry little pathological narcissist.
The heart of anyone he criticizes should swell with pride that their own existence has caused the jug-eared fool to feel his own monumental inadequacy.
Won’t be long before we’ll see Obama’s book in the discount bin in the racetrack aisle.
She needs a spot on the new Trump News Network.
McQueeg was Zero’s Campaign Manager.
The heart of anyone he criticizes should swell with pride that their own existence has caused the jug-eared fool to feel his own monumental inadequacy.
Straight to the point type, aren’t you ?
The following comments are from my website scrolled to after the article on Parkland Florida and the war on the NRA which should have been about the promise policies used at that school.
The leadership of the so called political opposition (Republican) will wonder why as they lose a crucial election because of their inability to stand on principles. When Presidential actions should have been denounced and the police defended. When as President Obama initiated his racial division policy through the abuse of the “Bully Pulpit’ which went unchalanged and subsequently led to attacks on law enforcement. The only person to courageously do so was Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke and has because he is black received the “Uncle Tom” treatment
Clarke decried Obama’s abuse of the “Bully Pulpit” to create racial division which wound up using other similar incidents such as Ferguson MO and NYC.. Where Obama supported by the media would defend the attacker resisting arrest killed in the struggle over a law officers gun. Alledging the attacker was an “unarmed victim” of police brutality because he was black. Subsequently. There were continuous attacks on police ending up in a score of deaths.It Began when Obama used a non descript incident known as The Zimmerman trial and encouraged racial division through his twice use of the “Bully Pulpit”
. Obama defended the black attacker who was killed (a 17 year old 5’11 175 pound Trayvon Martin) by a 40 something year old 5’6” black hispanic (Jorge Zimmerman) working security in an integrated housing complex that was attacked by Martin knocking Zimmerman to the ground and the black youth was killed in a struggle over Zimmerman’s gun.
The media portayed the incident as Martin was an innocent black youth murdered in cold blood because he was black and the guard as a white hispanic guarding an exclusive white “gated”community .
Obama used the incident to declare racial division by using the “Bully Pulpit” declaring Martin was a victim of whites who could have been; First; “his son”, then; Obama himself.
When that inflammatory defense was picked by black gangs It also wound up and was used as an excuse to commit a score of racial assaults ending in deaths and serious injuries.
All the while this was happening in various areas of the country Such as the murder of an Australian visitor from Melbourne Christopher Lane killed while exercising on a Duncan Oklahoma street by members of the black gang known as the Crypts.
Lane was one of Obama’s forgotten victims while the media portrays Martin as a hero.
Such assaults were described by the press as “black youths with nothing better to do” Although there were some gang members who admitted their assaults were “for Trayvon” but met by stony silence from the democrats or denial from MSM because initially it was dismissed as a Obama miss-speak. As if he didn’t rely on a teleprompter for carefully prepared text checked out by advisers giving him the facts.
Shamefully members of the opposition so called Republicans chose not to condemn this but convenient to ignore. Thus demonstrate they are politically dysfunctional. Unwilling to work with or even recognize legitimate concerns from what they call the tea party who in reality are the Reagan voters of 2016 and unable to congeal into a unified working political unit. They did not learn from 2012,2014 and some continue to blow off 2016. http://www.theusmat.com/index.htm
WOW, the poor guy led such a horribly dysfunctional life.
He was NEVER really given a “chance” in life.
What an ungrateful wretch.
And a rotten person to boot.
That fool thought of enough to say to put in another book!!! Why would Sarah Palin even bother to respond to anything he said about her or otherwise? He’s not worth wasting a brain cell on.
It was very well said for sure..some people are fast thinkers and great at putting their thoughts on paper OR screen OR whatever!
:) I try to be.
Glad to know Sarah got under his skin so much.
Newsmax: (Link) Sarah Palin reacts to Obama calling her out
McCain voted for Biden, more than ONCE this election cycle
Actually his name is Bathhouse Barry..people in Chicago still call him that
There is an academic clique of "critical theorists" who go around arbitrarily re-defining things to win arguments and sow confusion. Obama was in with them at Harvard. They are the closest thing the Democrat party has to spiritual leaders.
They define "intellectuals" to mean themselves. They attack decent people with outrageous slander, and when those people push back they are "anti-intellectuals".
So yes, by those standards Sarah Palin is indeed ... etc
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
