Posted on 11/10/2020 4:52:37 PM PST by little jeremiah
The purpose of this thread is to list the states with automatic voter registration, mostly by getting driver's licenses, but also through other means such as applying for social service. And combine that with sanctuary states, counties and cities. Counting ballots and making sure all voters are registered doesn't help solve the problem of illegals voting.
Article follows:
Automatic Voter Registration This webpage addresses automatic—or automated—voter registration, a process that generally involves the state department of motor vehicles and possibly other state agencies.
In 1993, Congress passed the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). The NVRA pioneered a new way of registering to vote in America. It required most states to provide citizens with an opportunity to register to vote when applying for or renewing a driver’s license at a department of motor vehicles (DMV) or other designated state agencies. Because of the requirement for DMVs to participate in voter registration, the NVRA is often referred to as “motor-voter.” This trend continues today. The U.S. Election Assistance Commission notes that during the 2016 election cycle, 33% of all voter registration applications, approximately 25 million, originated in a DMV. The technological improvements since 1993, and the scrapping of paper records, have prompted many states to upgrade and modernize their registration processes.
An Automated Process The improvements and efficiencies noted above commonly include upgrades in how voter registration data is transferred from DMVs to state voter registration systems. Throughout the 1990s and even into the early 2000s, many states relied on a paper-heavy registration process at the DMV, and some still do. Eligible voters in these states are asked to complete a paper registration form which is then sent to either a state or local election official for them to review and then input the voter’s information into the registration database.
Now, the collection of voter information is shifting from paper-based forms to digital. Many state DMV systems are now linked to the state voter registration database. This allows the DMV system to not only collect information on eligible voters but to electronically transfer information to the voter registration database, often through scheduled uploads.
As the DMV process becomes more automated and streamlined, many states are looking to apply these same standards to other state-designated agencies covered under NVRA. Under Section 7 of the NVRA, any state office that provides public assistance or operates state-funded programs that serve individuals with disabilities must offer opportunities to register to vote. It also requires states to designate other offices that provide this opportunity. Below is a table of state agencies that are currently participating in their state’s AVR program.
Aha, I see you pinged your list months ago.
P
Ha. This NATIONAL law certainly didn’t help the integrity of the election. And those states listed and those allowing illegal aliens to vote are just traitors as far as I’m concerned.
CHEATERS always try to CHEAT. They all make me barf.
There isn’t a national law.
There isn’t a national law.
************************************************************************************
In 1993, Congress passed the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).
NATIONAL per your own post.
“In 1993, Congress passed the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). The NVRA pioneered a new way of registering to vote in America. It required most states to provide citizens with an opportunity to register to vote when applying for or renewing a driver’s license at a department of motor vehicles (DMV) or other designated state agencies. Because of the requirement for DMVs to participate in voter registration, the NVRA is often referred to as “motor-voter.”
This is not related to a national voter ID, it was a terrible law assisting with election fraud, and I’m sure that’s what it was designed to do.
This is not related to a national voter ID, it was a terrible law assisting with election fraud, and I’m sure that’s what it was designed to do.
**************************************************************************************
This is the NATIONAL Law that I was referring to -— DUH. I was not referring to National ID—which as you know, I also think is a law that will wind up being detrimental just as this stinkin’ law has been detrimental.
The ignorant, treasonous Federal Congress Critters in general make things worse, and increase the FEDZILLA-TOTALITARIAN tilt. Nuff said.
Trump and Q have mentioned several times the necessity of a voter ID law.
Take it up with Trump.
Trump and Q have mentioned several times the necessity of a voter ID law.
Take it up with Trump.
*****************************************************************************
Snort - What a wimp out. I don’t care what Q and Trump have said, I do my own research and decide-so I don’t just march around like a sheeple. And you are the one that started this crap fest to begin with.
Talk to the hand! ✋
DJT also said get the SHOT — ain’t no way in HEdoubleHockeySticks!
With rotten states and hundreds of thousands of illegals voting, I see no alternative than a national voter ID law. I don’t see it as an infringment of privacy at all. I did not start a crap fest at all, I just disagreed with your position, as you did with mine.
Rational people can disagree without being rude and getting mad.
That has nothing to do with the topic. I am not saying DJT is God, but there are very few things I disagree with him on.
You would argue with a fence post and beat a dead horse.
And all I did was make a comment on the NATIONAL law that you referenced — to which you said there is NO national law.
I basically was trying to avoid getting into another discussion of national Id, because it’s a pointless waste of time-once you have stated a position—it is set in stone.
When a state’s government screws up, the people in that state need to take care of it—not cede more power to Fedzilla to “rescue” us from our plight.
The legislature of the states has the plenary power over the voting — it wasn’t enumerated to the Fed. and that’s the way the founders thought it should be. So I agree with them-not you.
Very little I disagree with DJT on either, but this is one. Now can you just not respond on this topic any further?
Nuff said.
Rational people can disagree without being rude and getting mad.
****************************************************************************
Who is mad? I would say that I am bored with hearing the exact same argument over and over. And I didn’t think I was particularly rude either. But I did want to discourage further discussion.
It is clear that honest and rational discussion is an activity that is foreign to your nature.
So be it.
I just watched Tucker steamroll over Frank Luntz.
That was the funniest mess I have seen lately.
Right back at you.
Anger management might be helpful.
correction
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.