Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: glennaro

Less than 200 for a recount.


9 posted on 11/10/2020 12:43:03 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: nwrep
Less than 200 for a recount.

Isn't that just for an automatic recount? There should be a higher number where the losing campaign can request a recount, isn't there?

15 posted on 11/10/2020 12:45:48 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

Automatic recount.

Anybody can demand a recount in any election. So you can stop spamming us with false DU propaganda.


17 posted on 11/10/2020 12:50:29 PM PST by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

I would expect a percentage, and not a hard number.


20 posted on 11/10/2020 12:54:23 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

200 votes I presume is an automatic recount. If it’s, say 500 votes either way, can the candidate request (and be awarded) a recount?


42 posted on 11/10/2020 1:28:33 PM PST by glennaro (Pity those who mask and cower out of fear; condemn those who promote fear as a virtue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

“Less than 200 for a recount.”

You know that’s not true. You’ve been corrected on it before.

It’s 0.1% of the total votes cast in that particular contest, and that means 3200 to 3300 votes for an automatic recount.


43 posted on 11/10/2020 1:31:40 PM PST by calenel (Tree of Liberty is thirsty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson