Posted on 11/10/2020 12:35:10 PM PST by AAABEST
Another Maricopa County drop on Monday evening showed Trump reducing Biden’s overall lead from 16,952 on Sunday afternoon to 14,746. According to the Arizona Republic, Trump fell short in the Monday evening drop of ballots in terms of overall pace, taking 49.2 percent of the 6,495 votes. Trump needs to take 60 percent of the remaining ballots in the state in order to take the lead.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
we will fund a hand count....we will.....
200 votes I presume is an automatic recount. If it’s, say 500 votes either way, can the candidate request (and be awarded) a recount?
“Less than 200 for a recount.”
You know that’s not true. You’ve been corrected on it before.
It’s 0.1% of the total votes cast in that particular contest, and that means 3200 to 3300 votes for an automatic recount.
They are hoping Trump will concede first. They have learned nothing in the last four years.
they will drag it out as long as possible, to reduce the time for an audit or re-count
Can’t we do a ballot “drop” of about 100,000 Trump votes? My understanding is that that’s the way it’s done now. Rules, what rules?
Yes they are. And Alaska which will should go for Trump says they are 61% done but have absentee and mail ballots but will not count those until 1 week after the election. So who knows maybe they will be receive millions of fake ballots for Biden. I doubt they would have done it to Alaska since it is only 3 votes we will see.
What about the Trump ballots thrown in the trash or buried under rocks? Nobody knows how much there really were.
Those remaining 63K ballots need to break Trump’s way 39K to Biden 24K in order to wipe out Biden’s lead.
That’s still a big ask...
It's a strategy. Think about it
This doesn’t look very good for Trump here in AZ—a toss-up at best at this time. He could still win if the provisional ballots cast on election day go strongly for Trump, which is entirely possible. But a big chunk of the provisionals are in Pima County, which is a blue county surrounding Tucson. There’s also a big USAF base in Pima County (which is how Martha McSally found her way to AZ), so if there’s a lot of provisionals from that area then anything is possible. Trump needs about 63% of the remaining vote to pass Biden. It’s roughly a toss-up at best, without knowing the location of the remaining ballots.
Trump may need Wisconsin to win this, along with PA,NC, and GA. Those four states would clinch the election for him. I just looked up the turnout in Wisconsin in the 2012 and 2016 elections, and it was 70% in both of those election. Somehow, incredibly, the turnout jumped all the way to about 90% in this election. That is not even remotely possible without some strange new external force acting on the election system this year. So that’s one state that the Trump campaign needs to thoroughly investigate.
I
This is such a freakin joke.
How about we call a lid and all the Red states form our own country and the blue states can do whatever they want?
Not enough ballots, sadly.
Phoenix is the smelly armpit of Arizona. Think ‘central Los Angeles’, yuck.
Arizona and Nevada are still counting votes? Michigan and Wisconsin are both in Biden’s column due to fraud? What about looking at Virginia and New Hampshire?
This is election is one big mess. Subtract votes by illegal immigrants and Trump wins AZ by at least 50,000.
I looked at the results statewide from NV, WI and PA using Benfords Law. I analyzed the three main Presidential candidates (Trump, Joe and JoJo) and something is really off when it comes to the Biden Crime Syndicate. I even compared the curves to VA where the Dems probably did not need to cheat to win.
I wonder if this mathematical law (Benfords), and the anomalies it is showing, will be brought up in a court at all. Apparently the law has been used in courts before, so that will be interesting.
Sorry, that is incorrect. It is the "Lesser of 0.1% and 200 votes."
I heard that Benford’s law-type evidence is “not admissible in court;” not sure if true or not.
It has been ruled admissible in the past, but the data and the person analyzing it have to he experts in the field. See pages 14 and 15 - https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-nmd-1_13-cr-00966/pdf/USCOURTS-nmd-1_13-cr-00966-4.pdf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.