[ifinnegan]

Kurtosis refers to how much a result deviates from expected bell curve shape.

Benford analysis has shown results for all candidates but Biden follow an expected distribution which is evidence of vote fraud.

I post this here as an FYI to all interested parties as a method to further determine vote fraud.

My guess is analyses of the state's where Biden vote has switch from well behind to barely ahead since after the polls were well closed would indicate fraud.

[Texas Eagle]

My guess is analyses of the state's where Biden vote has switch from well behind to barely ahead since after the polls were well closed would indicate fraud.

Especially if other races and issues on the ballots did not see a corresponding change in numbers and outcomes.

[littlehouse36]

“I post this here as an FYI to all interested parties as a method to further determine vote fraud.”

Much appreciated!

[ifinnegan]

Here is a U.S. expert in vote fraud analytics.

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~wmebane/

Trump camp needs to use him or similar expert to analyze the votes as soon as possible.

[MikeyB806]

This is the kind of evidence that could destroy the fake results of this election. Statistical impossibilities in multiple states could lead to runoffs for the election, if that’s even Constitutional.

[yoe]

(The Dominion software -Is Nancy Pelosi a silent partner of the company? Soros?)

Dominion Software is used in 47 US states including ALL OF THE BATTLEGROUND STATES. The Dominion software “glitch” ONLY took votes from President Trump and Republicans.

Dominion is used in 30 different states.

[Albion Wilde]

bump

[indthkr]

bump for later...

[goodnesswins]

Bookmarked under Fraud

[tinyowl]

Whether this instance of commentary is true ... so long as there is, somewhere, a meaningful if not perfect map of what happened and the resulting data ... which can be represented relationally or in whatever layer of complexity up you want to take that ... ... ... SQL is beautiful ... and an anomalous pattern SHOULD be detectable.

I always thought, leading up to the election, the dems would know they were going to lose and hence 'nuke the stadium' before or the day of the event ... so no meaningful result could ... well ... result.

What they did instead was cut the video of the game where no one was in the stands, kick the other team out of the stadium, and when the video came back the score had reversed. If no one was in the stands to see it, and they've torched the video, then the above doesn't hold. You need data in the first place if you're going to analyze it.

I imagine if there is clear analytical data analysis showing of a reliable dataset that shows an anomaly, the courts will judge that to be evidence. But if there is no dataset that can be queried, will the courts rule that the game can not be verified, and hence the result is invalid?

I don't know. I guess we'll see.

[cookcounty]

Benford’s law is not foolproof, there are ways to defeat it, though it does require some creativity by someone who knows Benfords law.

[cookcounty]

Benford’s law is not foolproof, there are ways to defeat it, though it does require some creativity by someone who knows Benfords law.