Posted on 11/06/2020 9:17:01 AM PST by Truthsearcher
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLdPRwvwc2Y
Except for Biden's vote tallies in Dem counties in MI, WI and PA.
from what I've read, between the hrs of 2am and 5am the morning after the election 1,300,000 plus votes came into the states of Wi,Mi, and Pa....all for biden....
can we take science into the courtroom?
We should be able to.
bttt
Hmmmm. I am pretty sure that the Left only believes in science when it goes their way.
DID THE CHINESE PRINT AND SUPPLY THESE BALLOTS? Covid, Part II? They are master counterfeiters!
we are science deniers, so no, we cannot take science into the courtroom. i wouldn’t lead with this...
Benford’s Law states that, in a naturally occurring set of numbers, the smaller digits appear disproportionately more often as the leading digits. The leading digits have the distribution shown in the following table, where the number 1 appears slightly more than 30% of the time as the leading digit, and the number 9 appears as the leading digit less than 5% of the time (which is a difference of 6x).
law of averages state if trump was getting 37% of democrat counties, he should get 37% of all democrat votes straggling in...
They also blow out the apparent turnout in those districts.
See Montgomery Co. (+14%) and Chester Co. (+9%) PA
Republicans gained in Congress because the fraud is in just a few already monopoly Democrat districts where vote counts exploded.
right..I understand what Benford’s law says....I just don’t understand WHY it works out that way....why number one is more frequent....
Even loaded dice will occasionally come up snake eyes.
Statistically it is pretty much impossible to have 100 random votes with all going to one candidate, but when 200,000 all come in for one candidate that is clear evidence of fraud.
That’s like flipping a coin and having it come up heads 1000 times in a row. Either the coin has two heads (meaning the result is fixed) or the person calling it heads is a liar and the other guy is blind.
Instead of Benford’s law, what about straight stratistical analysis.
Look at the voted from a particular precinct or neighboring precinct in several past elections. If the numbers are remarkably different, the chances of it being fraud are great.
And trace those ballots back to the voter. Does the voter have a tombstone with the date 2018 on it? Does the person no longer live in the State?
“How to spot the telltale signs of vote rigging” [BBC 2016]
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3902612/posts
” . . . I just don’t understand WHY it works . . . “
It’s explained in the video below (the explanation starts about halfway through), but you’ve got to be reasonably comfortable with math - particularly logarithms - if it’s going to help any. But at least it’s in a British accent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIsDjbhbADY
Suppose you start counting something, like the number of people living in a place. If it’s a very small number, like the number in a residence, you might stop at one, you might stop at nine. It’s more likely the number is one or two, than higher numbers like eight or nine.
If it’s a very large number, like the number that live in a country, you might stop in the 3 hundred millions, like the US, or the 1 billions, like China or India.
The simplest way to put it is that people don’t think randomly.
Voter Fraud Data Ping!
Those ballots could have been from overseas people voting. However, see the video posted above of the woman in a polling place filling out blank ballots
I thought election workers were not supposed to alter the ballots at all.
If I forgot to vote for President or I voted for both candidates or if machine could not read the ballot.
Tough no vote for President was counted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.