Posted on 11/06/2020 6:34:01 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
WASHINGTON - Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden took a narrow lead over President Donald Trump in the battleground states of Georgia and Pennsylvania on Friday, edging closer to winning the White House in a nail-biting contest as a handful of undecided states continue to count votes.
In Pennsylvania, Biden moved ahead of Trump by 5,500 votes on Friday morning, while in Georgia, he had opened up a 1,097-vote lead.
Biden, 77, would become the next president by winning Pennsylvania, or by winning two out of the trio of Georgia, Nevada and Arizona. Trump’s likeliest path appears narrower - he needs to hang onto both Pennsylvania and Georgia and also to overtake Biden in either Nevada or Arizona.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
So many questions, so little time, but I do wonder about some things.
1. Why is it that big states such as Florida and Texas get their votes counted by the end of election night, but these other states in dispute have all these problems?
2. Why is it, that Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Georgia, and maybe others, suddenly stopped reporting returns at about the same time on election night?
3. Why is it, that election officials who count votes in Allegheny County, PA, Pittsburgh area, took a day off from counting votes this week?
4. Why were observers banned from vote counting rooms in PA?
5. Why is it, that in the middle of the night on Wednesday morning, major bulk deliveries of ballots went to Detroit election headquarters, after the deadline for turning in ballots?
6. How can it be, that some precincts in Milwaukee, recorded more votes than registered voters in those precincts?
Just a few questions I have about all of this. Anyone have any answers?
Simple answer the election was stolen and they don’t give a crap how obvious it is.
“ Just a few questions I have about all of this. Anyone have any answers?”
************
Well, no need to over-think this. It’s actually very simple. Democrats always cheat, lie, steal. It’s in their DNA.
“We’ll keep counting until Biden wins”.
1. They likely started counting early and mail-in ballots as soon as they arrived rather than wait until Election Day to start counting them, as Pennsylvania law requires.
2. The Trump campaign sued Pennsylvania over lack of access to the vote count while demanding a recount in Wisconsin.
As for the rest I would need to look into it further. This is the best I can do at the moment.
Mr. President if you have any evidence of voter fraud, any at all, now is the time to make it public. This is the ultimate “put up or shut up” moment.
Simple answer the election was stolen and they don’t give a crap how obvious it is.
Trump overperformed in Philly and Biden has less votes than Hillary in 2016 yet Biden is winning PA? And Josh Shapiro’s Montgomery County got 70,000 more votes thank 2016. Not adding up.
The first time I remember going with my Dad when he voted was 1960, New York had these wonderful mechanical voting machines where you changed the state of a mechanical lever to vote, and opened the curtain with a big red lever which locked your votes and reset the levers. These machines were invented to limit paper ballot cheating, but like paper ballots, they would yield a tally by the early morning hours of the following day, and that was that. Yes, you could recount the ballots or re-tally the machines, but the results existed in physical form in the possession of authorities (i.e., the results were “analog”). In essence, "Election Day" was when everything happened and by Wednesday morning it was over.
What has been happening since 2000 (and maybe before) is the use of media, and technology, to create a condition where nobody knows what the result truly is - nobody knows how many votes were cast, nobody knows which votes count and which ones don't, and the final tally can change for days and even weeks (or until the Democrat wins). Most of the results, and now a lot of the votes themselves, are no longer analog but digital, and exist only as an ordered set of electrons, subject to change in many ways by many people.
This has created a fundamental change in public perception, and you can see it even here on FR. People go on and on about whether or not a winner has been "declared", usually by media people who have no access to the real data. As electronic voting, and now even apps meant to run on handhelds, define reality, we may be approaching or already be at the point where most people are accepting of the proposition that "nobody knows who won, we have to rerun the program, we have to call in the experts, it was Russian bots, it was Craig Livingstone, etc., etc.).
This problem is of course compounded by early voting, absentee voting, overseas voting, etc.
On election night in 1932, everybody knew that FDR had won a big victory - that in a country with no electronic media, no computers, and half paralyzed by depression. On election night in 1952, there were more votes for Eisenhower than Stevenson, and everybody knew THAT. Eight years ago (a century in digital years), Hugh Hewitt wrote a book called, “If It’s Not Close, They Can’t Cheat”. As long as people believe that only digital wizards can actually determine the result, that may no longer be true.
If we could conduct and tally elections in 1932 and 1952, we should be able to do it now - except that would upset our masters, who have worked so hard to create the status quo. They certainly won't give it up without a fight.
EVERY STATE except these battleground states ALL had their counts DONE with no problems ALL of them FLORIDA has a HUGE population YET they got it done!!! Also note that ALL of these states have Dem governors AND Dem SOS!!!
Just like they didn’t give a crap how obviously they spied on Trump and how obvioisly fake the impeachment was.
They have already sent to the DOJ over 3,000 examples of dead people voting, relocated people voting, he has put forth information where have you been???
The DOJ? SMH...
Excellent points. We conducted elections in this country without all this modern technology, but now, with modern technology, that is when we have all these issues?
If it were up to me, we would go back to old fashioned paper ballots, even though counting takes longer and theoretically subject to more human error than machine counted tallies.
Eff these people.
Supreme Court must throw out ALL mail in ballots and only count in-person voting and verifiable absentee ballots.
Absentee ballots = real person requested and received.
Mail-in Ballots = Donald Duck and Mickey Mouse on the voter rolls get a ballot which the local BLM fill out and mail in.
Mail-in ballots are a violation of the constitution. Mail in ballots are equivalent to a “twitter survey”. A mail-in ballot is a ‘ballot’, not a ‘vote’.
Votes are in person verifiable ID and absentee verifiable request with ID – A constitutionally protected VOTE. Everything else is unprotected BS and SC must throw them out in EVERY state. Most expeditiously, in the swing states.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.