Posted on 11/06/2020 3:50:27 AM PST by OL Hickory
Trump's legal team really needs to dig into this as it potentially offers the equivalent of W closing the skies on 911. Can POTUS or SCOTUS act based on the language of the amendment alone? I don't know. Supremacy clause implies those in violation should not be serving. Normally I'd expect some kind of due process for such major effects. But Due Process has its roots in the Bill of Rights and this arguably amends that... Yet the politics of applying it would be much cleaner through following pre-existing, albeit mostly forgotten, Congressional enabling scaffolding.
Thanks. Let’s hope it happens. 8>)
We need to do a China boycott.
At the very least.
Maybe even a capitol strike. Buy NOTHING. NO eating out, no disney, no netflix, nothing. Buy storebrand or make do.
Crash the tax base for biden.
Why not simply read the text of the amendment?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv
The president can not strip EVs from a state unless they deny the right to vote to part of their own inhabitants.
If he declares BLM and Antifa an insurrection, he COULD declare the rat reps, senators, and Biden and Harris as ineligible for office since they gave aid and comfort to an insurrection. (Section 3). Not sure if even Trump could pull that off though.
All state legislatures actually have the power to simply appoint electors. Per Article 2 of the Constitution electors are chosen in a manner to be determined by the state legislature. If any state legislature decided to ignore the election results and appoint a slate of electors, it would be perfectly constitutional.
Question: Former VP John Breckenridge received the state of South Carolinas electoral votes in the 1860 election that triggered the civil war. What was his margin of victory in the SC popular vote?
If you havent already guessed, its a trick question; there was no popular vote in SC in 1860 (or any other POTUS election prior). The state legislature appointed the electors directly, thus proving the point no popular vote is required by the Constitution.
MI legislatures could take their prose a step further. They could point out this has been done before in the election of 1824. AS ONE BIDEN'S CURRENTLY RECORDED VOTERS MAY RECALL, HAVING BEEN BORN BEFORE THEN! I think the earliest zombie voter identified so far was born in 1823. Yes in 2020 all is possible, the Zombie Apocalypse is upon us and they are voting! We need to up the rhetoric to get thru the media blockade.
This fraud has been set up by the Chicom virus and the measures allegedly to be used against it as pushed by China and its paid for political friends in the left. Don't let China Joe steal the country!
Yes and “George Washington was the only President elected unanimously,” yet he had the same popular voter. IIRC popular voting and direct presidential elections in some states preceded the Civil War, but I don’t recall the details off the top of my head.
Symbolically Trump should set up a MAGA rally at the Flight 93 Memorial because that embodies the spirit of normal Americans needed to win this battle. What is being done to steal this country is WORSE than 911 and deserves to be treated as such.
If that's latest practice then New Rules, as Bongino says. We should be following suit and printing ballots in GOP counties. Unless/until the SCOTUS weighs in....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.