Biden Says He Will Collaborate With China If Elected

epoch times ^ | 10/26/2020 | ALLEN ZHONG

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden has said, if elected, he’ll collaborate with China in two major areas.
“Our approach to China will focus on boosting American competitiveness, revitalizing our strengths at home, and renewing our alliances and leadership abroad,” the former vice president wrote in an article published on Oct. 22 in the World Journal, a lesser-known Chinese newspaper in New York.
“We’ll work to collaborate with China when it’s in our interest, including on public health and climate change.”
He made a similar commitment during the presidential debate with President Donald Trump on the same day. “I’m going to rejoin the Paris Accord and make China abide by what they agreed to,” he said.
Biden also proposed to deepen America’s ties with Taiwan.
The Biden campaign didn’t immediately respond to a request by The Epoch Times for comment.
According to the Paris agreement, China—as a Tier 2 country—has committed to peak its carbon emissions around 2030 and doesn’t have many mandated responsibilities for emissions reduction anytime soon.
China can also benefit from contributions from designated Tier 1 countries in the Paris Agreement.

[Sir Bangaz Cracka]

How shocking!!!

[databoss]

Pile of nonsense hogwash

[thinden]

“We’ll work to collaborate with China when it’s in our interest, including on public health and climate change.”

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

joey bags has to play ball with chicoms, it’s part of his employment package.

[FarmersareHeroes]

Biden continues to provide evidence for impeachment if the GOP ever controls Congress during his term.

[Tallguy]

“Collaborate”? Poor choice of words if you ask me. Who wrote your speech, Joe?

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

It’s hard to believe Biden’s comments will help him with swing voters, but it’s also hard to find these Biden quotes in the big media. Looks like censorship again.

[Pajamajan]

bttt

[chuckee]

After my son, Hunter, gets out of rehab, this big guy will appoint him as special envoy to the CCP.

[null and void]

I think the correct spelling for what he’ll do is: GROVEL.

Or more likely, one of the few words that made it from Chinese to English unaltered: Kowtow.

[Boogieman]

How does the Babylon Bee stay in business? Biden is satirizing himself!

[preacher]

l8r

[Liz]

BIDEN CAMPAIGN PROMISE: “I’m going to rejoin the Paris Accord".......

2020 Candidate Biden vows $5 trillion deal to re-enter the Paris Climate Accord that Obama negotiated
and the one Pres Trump rejected on the first day of his presidency....

===============================================

BACKSTORY----Then-pres Barack Obama transferred $500m tax dollars to Green Climate Fund to protect Paris deal, his last days in office;
the second $500M withdrawn from State Dept using executive powers; bypassed congressional support.
Michael Slezak / Tue 17 Jan 2017 / Last modified on Wed 14 Feb 2018

Obama transferred ANOTHER $500m installment taken from the State Dept to the
Green Climate Fund just three days before leaving office. Photo: Evan Vucci/AP Barack

Obama has heeded calls to help secure the future of the historic Paris agreement by transferring a second $500m installment to the Green Climate Fund, just three days before he leaves office.

The fund was a key aspect of the Paris agreement signed in 2015, which aims to keep global warming “well below” 2C and aspires to keep warming to 1.5C. Established in 2010, it is financed by wealthy countries and used to assist developing countries with adaptation and mitigation. It was widely seen as a key measure to bring both rich and poor countries to the negotiating table. The US committed to transferring $3bn to the fund. The new instalment leaves $2bn owing, with the incoming president, Donald Trump, expected to cease any further payments.

=====================================

Wonder if the $500M tax dollars made a short cut thru a numbered account in a French Polynesian bank?

[Redwood71]

“.... this big guy will appoint him as special envoy to the CCP.”

Not so big...Kamala Harris is a small piece of meadow muffin. And when they determine Joe to fail the M’Naghten test, they can pull the plug on him and reboot with Kamala the other insane one.

rwood

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

To fail the M’Nagten test would, in a criminal trial, mean to be declared legally sane. Did you mean to say “pass the M’Nagten test,” i. e. be determined to be insane?

[Redwood71]

“Did you mean to say “pass the M’Nagten test,” i. e. be determined to be insane?”

You’re probably right with your wordage. But I can’t understand why someone would create a test for you to pass to be insane. I would think failure of the test would prove the failure to be lucid. But as I’m told all the time, science can’t be wrong.

rwood

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

Well, a defendant in a capital murder case who was obviously the killer might have that strategy fail if the test determined he was legally sane. Now if I wanted to own a gun but the court was deciding whether I was a risk because of my mental condition, I certainly would welcome a finding that I was sane. But my understanding is M’Nagton is to determine if someone is guilty of a crime in an act that has already occured.

[Redwood71]

There are a few insanity defenses to include the M’Naghten Rule; the Irresistible Impulse Test; the Durham Rule; and the Model Penal Code test.

According to findlaw, and with the assistance of each state, thee are a few differences.

The “M’Naghten Rule” - Defendant either did not understand what he or she did, or failed to distinguish right from wrong, because of a “disease of mind.”

The “Irresistible Impulse” Test - As a result of a mental disease, defendant was unable to control his impulses, which led to a criminal act.

The “Durham Rule” - Regardless of clinical diagnosis, defendant’s “mental defect” resulted in a criminal act.

The “Model Penal Code” Test for Legal Insanity - Because of a diagnosed mental defect, defendant either failed to understand the criminality of his acts, or was unable to act within the confines of the law.

To me they are all a cop out for many criminals to escape the death sentence or long tours of penal facilities with a chance to be “healed” in a hospital setting. Course being forced for many years to eat jello could be considered to be cruel and unusual. So it’s a tossup.

rwood