Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exnavy
When you go in public you pretty much lose the expectation of privacy.

You also need to prove damages. You would have to prove:

1) Your face is a known brand which produces revenue for you
2) The publication of your image made $ specifically from using your face (vs. a generic)
3) Your brand was weakened from that use
4) Amount of $ the use weakened your brand (via forensic accounting analysis)

Good luck surmounting ANY of these hurdles, even if you got past the expectation of privacy.

If Tom Cruise were to go to Trader Joe's and I caught a pic of him and sold it for $20,000 he would have no basis for a suit.

Thus, papparazzi.

16 posted on 10/25/2020 4:18:09 AM PDT by freedumb2003 ("Do not mistake activity for achievement." - John Wooden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003

I understand the legal aspect of this, the potential for government abuse is great. We may need a constitutional ammendment. Because i am not a public official, movie star, or a notable individual in any way. My public petsona is nonextant. Therefore, my expectation of privacy is paramount and supercedes the government need for database.


23 posted on 10/25/2020 4:29:11 AM PDT by exnavy (american by birth and choice, I love this country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson