Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/22/2020 8:18:32 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Amy Coney Barrett and Sarah Palin. Hard to find two more accomplished women. The Left hates them, and feminists wanted to see them destroyed.


2 posted on 10/22/2020 8:21:17 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This is typical of libs. Commies.

They LOVE their groupings, they can do no wrong (to wit, riots). Until they give just one wrong opinion. Then the name-calling starts, complete with racial and sexist epithets.


3 posted on 10/22/2020 8:24:40 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs. I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This is the response I got from one of my useless senators when I contacted her to support Judge Barrett:

“Thank you for contacting me about the vacancy on the United States Supreme Court left by the passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. I welcome your thoughts on this important topic.
As you may know, the Appointments Clause of the Constitution gives the President the power to nominate federal judges, which includes Supreme Court justices. After the President nominates a candidate, the nomination is sent to the Senate for consideration where the Senate Committee on the Judiciary holds a hearing on the nomination. If a nominee is voted favorably out of the Senate Judiciary Committee, he or she may receive a confirmation vote on the Senate floor.
On September 26, 2020, President Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett to fill the open seat on the Supreme Court. As your Senator, I take seriously my constitutional responsibility to provide advice on and consent to the President’s nominations, particularly with respect to lifetime appointments to the federal judiciary. I exercise due diligence for all nominations and thoroughly vet every nominee whose position requires Senate confirmation. In this case, the rush to confirm Judge Barrett’s nomination violates precedent set just four years ago for filling a Supreme Court vacancy in a presidential election year. In fact, unlike the 2016 election, millions of Americans across the country, including in Nevada, are already voting. I have called on my colleagues to honor precedent and ensure that the American people have their say at the ballot box before the Senate considers a lifetime appointment to the Court. For now, Judge Barrett’s nomination to the Supreme Court is currently pending before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Should the nomination come to the Senate floor for a vote, I will be sure to keep your thoughts in mind.
It is an honor to represent you and all Nevadans in the United States Senate and I welcome your input as we work to find common ground in the 116th Congress. To stay informed of my work in the Senate, please visit my website and follow me on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.”

I am still crafting my response now that the committee has done their job. How disgusting. How about some leadership and you tell the minority leader that you plan to be part of setting a new “precedent”. Disgusted but not surprised.


4 posted on 10/22/2020 8:28:40 AM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

bookmark


5 posted on 10/22/2020 10:03:38 AM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson