Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iowa Supreme Court upholds new law that could invalidate thousands of ballot requests
The Hill ^ | 10 21 2020 | Zack Budryk

Posted on 10/21/2020 7:30:57 PM PDT by yesthatjallen

The Iowa Supreme Court has upheld a Republican-backed law barring auditors from fixing errors in absentee ballot applications on behalf of voters.

In the 4-3 ruling, the court barred county auditors from correcting incomplete applications based on state voter databases, according to The Associated Press. While auditors were permitted to make the changes before the new law, they will now be required to send them back to applicants to correct.

“We are not persuaded the statute imposes a significant burden on absentee voters. It is not a direct burden on voting itself,” the four justices wrote. They wrote that only about 13,000 absentee ballot requests out of over 842,000 had not been fulfilled as of Friday.

In their dissent, the minority wrote that the law would “likely cause thousands of voters to not receive their ballot in time to use it.”

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: 2020election; ballotapplications; ballots; iowa

1 posted on 10/21/2020 7:30:57 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Oxley one of the 3 bad ones. Who are the other 2?


2 posted on 10/21/2020 7:34:20 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX (I'm old enough to remember when you actually had to be able to do something to be hired to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Good. They are “correcting” incorrect ballots in Maryland.

Fill it out wrong? It gets shredded.


3 posted on 10/21/2020 7:38:31 PM PDT by cyclotic (The most dangerous people are the ones that feel the most helpless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
“We are not persuaded the statute imposes a significant burden on absentee voters. It is not a direct burden on voting itself,” the four justices wrote.

Absolutely! If you cannot follow simple ballot instructions, you shouldn't be voting!

4 posted on 10/21/2020 7:40:07 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom ("Inside Every Progressive Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out" -- David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen; All

I would really like to know how many ill, incapacitated, or whatever honest-to-Gawd VOTERS we have in America that can’t get their butts to their polling places on Election Day.

I TOTALLY understand absentee ballots for our Miltary-Types, but the rest of us who are stateside really need to get out and VOTE in PERSON and take our Parents and Grandparents and any friends and neighbors that need a ride with us. How hard is that? It’s an HONOR and a DUTY to do so!

Whose idea was this in the first place? I truly do not know the origins of ‘absentee voting.’

One Day, One Vote Per Person!


5 posted on 10/21/2020 7:43:58 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
Whose idea was this in the first place? I truly do not know the origins of ‘absentee voting.’

One Day, One Vote Per Person!

Agree.

Over 200 years of everyone voting on the same day and the last 20 years, people can't walk down the street or drive to a polling booth on election day.

Absentee. Mail in. Same day. Provisional. Harvesting.

6 posted on 10/21/2020 7:52:23 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

The fact that 3 ruled against means we’re teetering on the edge of destruction.


7 posted on 10/21/2020 8:17:47 PM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
...Absolutely! If you cannot follow simple ballot instructions, you shouldn't be voting!...

They may be simple to you, but I have a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from a prestigious University and they are frequently ambiguous to me.

8 posted on 10/21/2020 8:24:53 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Ya, but election officials should be able to correct a “misvote” for Trump, no?

LOL


9 posted on 10/21/2020 8:44:18 PM PDT by Hypo2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

So what if the law imposes a significant burden, as long as the burden is applied equally to everyone?


10 posted on 10/21/2020 9:00:47 PM PDT by fwdude (Pass up too many hills to die on, and you will eventually fall off the edge of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Democrat corruption in Iowa? Oh no, Jim. Tell me it’s not true!

Jim: If there is a Democrat around, it is true!

“In space, you can hide a lot of Republican ballots”. Ripley!


11 posted on 10/21/2020 9:23:50 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Except these are ballot applications not actual ballots.


12 posted on 10/21/2020 10:20:18 PM PDT by BiteYourSelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson