Meh. It’s looked like 2016 from day one to me. Does anyone remember during the D primary debates all the candidates were ahead of trump by double digits? it was absurd on the face of it.
I learned a long time ago to ignore the public polls. That perspective was merely re-enforced in 2016.
“Suddenly”
48-46 is quite a familiar looking number.
But let’s do better than that this time around.
Take out California, New York and New England and Trump is winning big time in most states. Only overt, massive fraud will give Biden Pennsylvania and Michigan.
“Libertarian candidate Jo Jorgensen has the support of 3%”
I’m voting Libertarian to SEND A MESSAGE to purify the GOP. Just look at what Roberts did yesterday and also what Sasse said about Trump. Losing this election will teach them!!!! They’ll all become just like Trump if we get our asses kicked.
(just kidding, but I ran into a few of the above types here last weekend)
Was it 48-46 12 days out or on election day?
Wasn’t the gap 8.5 just over a week ago?
“the race is tightening”
Lemme rephrase what they really mean:
“Trump’s winning”
Biden peaked too early. Momentum is now with POTUS.
The explanation of the methodology for this poll is remarkable for what is missing. The only clue about how they identified a representative sample, was the numbers of Republicans, Democrats, and independents. But, if for example, all of the Republicans were suburban or urban dwellers then they do not have a representative sample and the poll will not be right.
Most polls these days have this defect, so we have to assume that this one is no exception. The only exceptions that I know are those of Richard Baris at People’s Pundit and Trafalger.
The other flaw is that this is a nationwide poll that measures the popular vote. This poll is about the Beauty Contest which does not count. The contests in the states are the ones that count. Trump will lose the popular vote, but he will likely win in the Electoral College.
Joe Biden could not be reached for comment. Lid on. Like margarine.
If Hillary and 15(?) other Republicans couldnt beat Trump, how could Biden do it?
Same pattern every time. They always claim the Democrat is way ahead to try to discourage Republican voters. Then, not wanting to look like the Leftist hacks they are,
Pollsters refusing to factor in latest data about Hispanics and blacks surging for Trump. Rally’s are bothering liberals more than they let on as well.
I am worried about the fraud here in Texas. There was a drive through voting operation which involved Dallas Jones who is a campaign person for Biden in Harris county (Houston) this involved using fake drivers licenses from China. Ken Paxton is aware of it but I don’t know what happened to the fake, coerced and fake ballots already cast.
There was a little bit of info a few weeks ago about it and then it disappeared. I saw a report yesterday from an investigative reporter about it and it sounds bad 1000’s of ballots.
Here is his periscope report he was also on newsmax on Saturday talking about it.
https://www.pscp.tv/w/1YqKDpoAdEoKV
https://twitter.com/NationalFile/status/1318296918800371717
That’s as far as they need to go. “Looks like 2016” means that no matter how much Trump wins by, they can say they predicted it. If Trump loses, the libs won’t care by how much, and if Trump wins they can attempt to delegitimize him.
I want Trump to win by so much that we can relentlessly mock the leftist for the next four years and keep them off balance. A total repudiation of their treason and hate. And two or three more SC picks wouldn’t be so bad, either. :)
“Suddenly”
I’m shocked there is gambling in Casablanca.
This happens every 4 years. Double digit lead for the dems and “suddenly” the race tightens at the end.
One good thing this year is so many people seem to have learned this lesson. Even a recent bogus poll showing Biden up 18 points was simply shrugged off- even by the concern trolls.
I’ve seen this before. All those “Democrats in the lead” polls suddenly shrink as the pollsters try to save their credibility.
FAIL.