wonder who Trump has on deck to fill her seat on the 7th???
Posted on 10/14/2020 11:28:27 AM PDT by Kaslin
Words don;t fail me.....ALL DEMOCRATS ARE VILE, EVIL, VICIOUS, LYING DESTROYERS of GOOD PEOPLE and GOOD THINGS!
After the savaging they gave Kavanagh, anyone willing to go through a confirmation hearing as a Republican would be a fool not to prepare themselves mentally and intellectually for the inevitable ordeal if they agree to accept a nomination to the SC.
It appears to me that Blumenthal has Parkinsons.
She isn’t going to take Bloomie’s crap, she just shoved her answer right up his rear.
Blumenthal wants Barrett to answer as other liberal female appointees have....Judge Barrett knows judges can’t make law...Blumenthal is bullying her.
Unflappable and formidable at the same time. Barrett seems to have what it takes to lead this court despite Roberts being in charge in name only.
She’s very articulate. Glad to have her mind on our side.
Her record...
Her views...
Her sharp mind...
Her family, what we know of it...
Vote her in already.
As such, she has had years of experience in dealing with a bunch of know-it-all kids. I don’t say that with any pejorative.
At least not for the kids.
Judge Barrett is doing what she’s doing with a cup of chamomile tea and her brilliant brain: no legal pads, no notes, no prep materials, etc.!
Yes, but when pressured, (by Klobuchar), she pushes back as if she was slapping a lawyer before her court.
If (Klobuchar) persisted, Judge Barrett would have her held in contempt.
I already hold (Klobuchar) in contempt. The F-ing BIOTCH!
Agree.
No doubt ACB was entirely prepared for an extensive examination of her credentials; however, she was not in a position to assume the Chair's duty to manage the hearing.
That duty to manage would have included immediately forcing and finishing such a Kavanaugh-like issue or, at a minimum, knocking the Dem game plan off schedule.
Failing in that duty, as I proposed last evening elsewhere on these pages the following response might have been entirely appropriate and within the realm of Barrett's role.
"I will answer your question, senator, in two parts. The first part, is no. The second part is, you most likely would not ask such an offensive question unless you had evidence of such action on my part, so if you do I suggest you have an obligation to this committee, to the nation as a whole, to my children sitting behind me, and to me, to disclose any such evidence, here, now."
The Chair should appreciate such a response.
wonder who Trump has on deck to fill her seat on the 7th???
Judge Judy.
DemonicRats can’t rattle her.
LOL i think that’d be no...
So, who does Judge Judy support for president?
In January of 2020, Judge Judy made it known that she supported former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg for president.
But shortly after, in March 2020, he officially dropped out of the 2020 presidential race as a Democratic candidate and endorsed Joe Biden, as CNBC reports, “saying the former vice president has the best chance of defeating President Donald Trump.”
You wrote:
“I will answer your question, senator, in two parts. The first part, is no. The second part is, you most likely would not ask such an offensive question unless you had evidence of such action on my part, so if you do I suggest you have an obligation to this committee, to the nation as a whole, to my children sitting behind me, and to me, to disclose any such evidence, here, now.”
Very bad advice for anyone who, in this day of false “recovered memories” might find himself/herself under interrogation. First of all, never ever elaborate, “no” or “yes” is enough.
And for heaven’s sake, don’t ever use such a word as “evidence.” That will be twisted to mean you know you have done such a thing and know/suspect there evidence you did so. Say “allegation” if feel you must elaborate which, again, is a very foolish thing to do. Don’t give them anything they can twist and use against you. Don’t give them an opening to start a new line of questioning.
This is how innocent people, trying to clear their names, get into a lot of trouble. There already is a presumption of guilt by the interrogator, and there is nothing you can say or do to make it better but you can easily make it a whole lot worse!
You wrote:
“I will answer your question, senator, in two parts. The first part, is no. The second part is, you most likely would not ask such an offensive question unless you had evidence of such action on my part, so if you do I suggest you have an obligation to this committee, to the nation as a whole, to my children sitting behind me, and to me, to disclose any such evidence, here, now.”
Very bad advice for anyone who, in this day of false “recovered memories” might find himself/herself under interrogation. First of all, never ever elaborate, “no” or “yes” is enough.
And for heaven’s sake, don’t ever use such a word as “evidence.” That will be twisted to mean you know you have done such a thing and know/suspect there evidence you did so. Say “allegation” if feel you must elaborate which, again, is a very foolish thing to do. Don’t give them anything they can twist and use against you. Don’t give them an opening to start a new line of questioning.
This is how innocent people, trying to clear their names, get into a lot of trouble. There already is a presumption of guilt by the interrogator, and there is nothing you can say or do to make it better but you can easily make it a whole lot worse!
Hey Klobuchar and Coons, SUCK IT!
SHE’LL BE CONFIRMED
SHE’LL RULE ON OBAMACARE (ACA)
SHE’LL SHIFT THE COURT RIGHT 5/4 for sure, 6/3 when Roberts finds his BALLS.
SHE’LL RULE MORE LIKE THOMAS THAN SCALIA (PRAISE GOD!) in other words she’s even to the right of Scalia!
SUPREME COURT JUSTICE AMY CONEY BARRETT!
A LIFETIME APPOINTMENT. MAY SHE LIVE LONGER THAN RUTH BUZZY GINSBERG.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.