Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu

“people were just willing to eat crap cause they didn’t have the power. So we could call people Eskimos, or Redskins, or Honey, or Boy, and too bad if they didn’t like it.”

Eskimo was never known by the general populace as being a derogatory term.

When people used the other terms you mention, it’s known that those are derogatory terms.

People who used Eskimo simply though it meant Alaskan natives and was never meant to be derogatory.

In fact quite the opposite, as seen in such terms as Eskimo kiss which had zero negative connotations.

Your analogy is not apt.


104 posted on 10/12/2020 9:41:33 AM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: ifinnegan

Doesn’t matter. It isn’t their name. It’s NEVER been their name. It’s the name explorers gave them based on stuff their non-Inuit guides told them. The very fact of saying “we don’t care what you call yourselves, we’re calling you Eskimos” is innately derogatory. It’s declaring they don’t have a right to name themselves. I say you’re Tim and I don’t give a crap if you wanna be Jim, Tim it is, suck it up. Same thing. They’re Inuit. Their name. That’s ALWAYS been their name. And we know this now. The word has circulated. So stop calling them Tim.


109 posted on 10/12/2020 9:45:37 AM PDT by discostu (Like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson