Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: knighthawk

So, if he had received the ballot, he would have told election officials to tighten things up, right?


3 posted on 10/05/2020 3:14:07 AM PDT by JohnnyP (Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JohnnyP

Another scam that doesn’t get any press at all is the one in Hillsborough County where the guy comes in to vote at his assigned polling place on election day and the e-poll book tells the inspector that the guy has already voted. Instead of the official response being “too bad so sad you’re done” as it should be because the system doesn’t make mistakes, the presumption policy -wise is that yes the system could be “wrong”, so we err in favor of the voter and allow him to immediately vote a provisional ballot. Dollars to donuts those “provisionals” don’t get rejected by the so-called “panel” of observers at the county supervisor of elections office. They don’t have the time or the predilection to dicker about each one, they are mostly Democrats, so they just approve them all. So hundreds of these felons get to vote twice and no one knows about it. How did we ever get to this level of corruption?


8 posted on 10/05/2020 3:37:01 AM PDT by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: JohnnyP

Of course there is no violation of the law since his intent was not to commit voter fraud. At least that’s the way it works in Ohio


20 posted on 10/05/2020 5:39:48 AM PDT by griswold3 (Democratic Socialism is Slavery by Mob Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson