Posted on 09/25/2020 11:24:25 PM PDT by STE=Q
I also haven’t read what she wrote in that ruling. Have you?
But she wrote that that would be the correct thing to do.
There is no under oath holding to what scenarios a prospective judge might imagine—other than not ruling out such a scenario that she just doesn’t happen to be imagining.
PS I see on another thread you are being an apologist for Gowdy. That last b in your screen name wouldn’t stand for Bush, by chance, would it?
She wrote that if a devout catholic was required to sign the death warrant and that conflicted with his conscience. Then he/she should recuse themselves. She has always advocated that the law be followed. Give unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s and give unto the Lord that which is the Lord’s. The Law is Caesar’s domain.
Yes
YOu have no argument and aren’t bothering to address the evidence.
That’s the ting about SCOTUS. You never know until start ruling on the court. I’m not sure about Barrett. I expect she will mostly toe the corporate GOP.
However, I am sure Lagoa is the most likely of the two to bend to the pressure of being in the “Ginsburg seat.” She’s got Wise Latina 2.0 written all over her. Patronage from Crist and Guac Boy. Married into high powered Democrat family. Etc.
I am not apologist for Gowdy. I simply pointed out that has a member of the House there was absolutely nothing Gowdy could do (other then expose them) to punish those that tried to overthrow our gov. That is the job of DOJ and I have been screaming for DOJ to do it’s damn job.
Of course not. Who told you that, the Easter Bunny? Open you eyes and educate yourself, they all campaign for these jobs, that's the only way anyone gets one.
I say no. I’m for Amy.
I hope that I am as wrong about her as I am wrong about her education, but probably not.
Could be. You are right that we don’t really know. That they were apparently the two put to the top by the Federalist Society frauds advising Trump says a lot.
Of course, I hope we are wrong and Trump gets a real constitutionalist in there in the next five weeks. Time is short.
We shall see.
There is no one single judge that fits the total bill here so we must pick someone who checks the boxes that most conservatives feel need checking and judge Barrett appears to be that person. The last perfect person was strung up on a cross at Calvary. So folks please don’t try and crucify Judge Barrett just because she failed to check one box you favored out of all the boxes available.
I’m not a fan of the Federalist Society after Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. The GOP has surrendered on social issues and the SCOTUS nominees they confirm reflect that view. The Senate confirms them to deliver for the Chamber of Commerce and that is all. What we can’t afford now is a traitor like Souter. That is a big risk due to the “Ginsburg seat” issue and Lagoa seems much more likely that Barrett to betray us totally.
Right up there with you.
GW Bush proved that in spades.
Spot on.
Lagoa could be the female David Souter. Not enough of a track record to read the tea leaves on her. Wait and see on her.
If you want a Judge that is a strict constitutionalist and some one that goes by what the text of the law says then there in no one better, male or female, then Amy Barrett. If you want a Republican judge then you will be disappointed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.