[rktman]

Funny stuff here because as usual, "their" position on any subject is the correct one. Right? Uh, not so much. Liberal tears are yummy!

[Trillian]

They want a judge that would use their position for judicial tyranny and activism, just like their sainted ruthie.

[MGunny]

A devout catholic and a firm believer of 2nd Amendment Rights. That is just A OK by me!!! Confirm!!!!}

[BenLurkin]

What does Slate claim makes her “cruel”?

[Raycpa]

Be still my heart.

[Sirius Lee]

there is no doubt that Barrett would dramatically expand the Second Amendment

Screw the anti-Catholic faggots, Amy is the one.

[Veggie Todd]

To quote another FReeper, it’s not RGB’s seat. It’s an empty seat on the Supreme Court.

[exnavy]

So the top girl is a strict constitutionalist. We need a no crybaby sign.

[nonsporting]

there is no doubt that Barrett would dramatically expand the Second Amendment

I am hoping the Court can remove many of the 2nd Amendment INFRINGEMENTS that have been allowed to stand.

There's more: Protect innocent life and drive a stake in the heart of the ORWELLIAN named "Affordable Care Act."

[McGavin999]

If Roe v Wade was good law the Dems wouldn’t be so worried about it. It would go back to the states. If you want legal abortion then move to a state that allows it.

[ClearCase_guy]

Hey, I was already a supporter of Amy — Mark Joseph Stern can stop trying to sell me on her. I’m sold!!

[snarkytart]

its not RBG seat, she didn’t own it, it is a VACANCY left on the court.

[nonsporting]

...fundamentally cruel version of the Law...

I cannot think of anything more CRUEL that the slaughter of the unborn. This is monsterously cruel.

The left wants to DEFUND and DISBAND police, while at the same time DISARMING the law abiding. This is INSANELY CRUEL.

[fatman6502002]

I can’t think of a better endorsement for President Trump’s pick than Slate writing this article.

[henkster]

Slate wants you to think all these things are bad. But I read their prediction and thought “OK, I can go with that.”

[G Larry]

Well Mark, you should have thought of that before her 2017 Senate hearings.

The Senate will just have to have the vote based upon what they know, because there IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR HER TO ENDURE ANOTHER SET OF SENATE HEARINGS!!!!!!

[fatman6502002]

Watch this video of Amy Coney Barrett explaining her judicial philosophy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0ZN532f9d0&t=1986s

[PlateOfShrimp]

Let ‘em get all lathered up and loaded up with Handmaiden’s Tale arguments, and then spring Grant or Larsen at the last moment.

[metmom]

That’s a problem why?

[caseinpoint]

RGB was the justice who made her decisions based on liberal zeitgeist and then twisted the Constitution to justify her decision and, if the Constitution didn’t support her decisions, she ranged far and wide for international laws.

[campaignPete R-CT]

I’ve said before that I think a Barrett nomination will end in a train wreck. I don’t know what of advice the President is getting.

She’s the wrong nominee in the middle of an election.