Ping!
Good article, accurate.
“The issues are important and immediate: On November 3, the Democrats, already fearing they will lose in a landslide on election night, need to manufacture votes for weeks to even have a chance at winning some states. As these states begin their stall, court challenges will be mounted and might be expedited to the Supreme Court. We cannot have a four-four Courtassuming that Roberts would find some insane legal reasoning to rule against Trump. So, the justice must be confirmed before the election.”
Great minds think alike. I was just pondering this possibility/motive today.
The Dems want it to remain 4-4 to have any chance to steal the election.
Roberts cannot be counted on for anything.
Thanks for posting. Always interesting perspective from Larry. Thanks much, LS. BUMP!
It would appear that Collins has turned out to be a DIABLO (Democrat In All But Label Only) rather than a RINO. If she’s toast with the ‘rat voters and likely a goner, why not vote to confirm unless she truly is siding with the ‘rats?
I think Larsen is likely as well.
I get Sandra Day O’Connor vibes from her, but at this point I don’t even know if there is a female OR male Thomas or Scalia out there to be named.
Thanks Lar. Make a ping list! Add me to it!
What makes anyone think that waiting will NOT result in no holds barred? Whoever is nominated will be attacked with the same fierceness be it next week or next year!
- United States Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, quoted in Emily Bazelon, "The Place of Women on the Court"Adobe Acrobat file, The New York Times Magazine, July 7, 2009
----------------------------
Saw this " Margaret Sanger" type quote on a different thread this morning... Have you seen it? And do you think it's credible?