[springwater13]

Notice she said prior to the election. That doesn’t mean she won’t vote in the lame duck session.

[billyboy15]

“Notice she said prior to the election. That doesn’t mean she won’t vote in the lame duck session.”

Yes and I’m guessing most here never saw that.

[ealgeone]

she’s trying to split the middle.

[FreeReign]

Notice she said prior to the election. That doesn’t mean she won’t vote in the lame duck session.

I suspect it will be too late by then. The SC will probably need to make key election decisions before the election.

[sport]

It doesn’t mean that she would either. If you think that she is a Trump supporter, you are in for a surprise.

[Stravinsky]

She also says that the President elected on November 3rd should be the one to pick the justice. I’m not sure why so many are ignoring that part.

[Abby4116]

That doesn’t mean she won’t vote in the lame duck session.

Trump better not be a lame duck.

[Swarthy Greek Immigrant]

No, Collins whomever wins the election can then nominate. She is too stupid to have thought of qualifying it like you did.

[The Pack Knight]

Collins has also said that the Senate should not confirm Trump’s nominee in the lame duck session if Biden wins.