CONCLUSION
Based onour disposition of all of the claims set forth above, we grant relief on the claims set forth in Counts I, II, and V of the Democratic Party’s petition for review as followsand hold that: (Count I) the Election Code permits county boards of election to collect hand-delivered mail-in ballots at locations other than their office addressesincluding drop-boxesas indicated herein, seesupra. at 20 n. 15;(Count II) a three-day extension of the absentee and mail-in ballot received-by deadlineis adopted such that35Respondent has not asserted that the Pennsylvania Constitution offers greater protection under the circumstances presented. Thus, for purposes of our review, we treat them as co-extensive.
[J-96-2020] -63ballots mailedby voters via the United States Postal Service and postmarked by 8:00 p.m. on Election Day , November 3, 2020, shall be counted if they are otherwise valid and received by the county boards of election on or before 5:00 p.m. onNovember6, 2020; ballots received within this period that lack a postmark or other proof of mailing, or for which the postmark or other proof of mailing is illegible, will be presumed to have been mailed by Election Day unless a preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that it was mailed after Election Day; (Count V) the poll watcher residency requirement set forth in Section 2687(b) of the Election Code, 25 P.S. §2687(b), is constitutional. Also,for the reasons set forth herein, we deny the relief sought in Count IIIand IVof the petition for review
last page, Page 63, http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Supreme/out/J-96-2020mo%20-%20104548450113066639.pdf?cb=1
Bottom line this is a rat court. The People of PA have six weeks to get their ballots in. The only reason the scumbags only this court would do this would to allow the rats to stuff in ballots when they will know how many they will need to overcome a Trump lead. As another poster said the postmark date is easily faked.