Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AG Barr Discusses Timing of the Durham Investigation
Townhall.com ^ | 9/14/20 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on 09/14/2020 12:45:48 PM PDT by Shane

Speaking exclusively to Townhall on a recent flight from Cleveland to Washington, D.C., Attorney General Bill Barr discussed the timing of U.S. Attorney John Durham's investigation into the FBI's Russia probe and efforts by the Department of Justice to ensure it remains non-political on the matter.

"I've said that there are sort of two missions, I see it. One is to get to the bottom of what happened and get the facts out about that and we are going to do that and you know, try to be careful about that, that we don't do anything that would unduly interfere with the election," Barr said. "And then there's the issue of whether someone crossed the line. In the course of these, in my view, unjustified and horrible abuse of power, actually cross the line and committed a federal offense and I can't really say anything about the status of that investigation except that it's continuing and we'll be careful about not bringing indictments in a way that can be viewed as interfering with the election."

In August, FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith became the first individual under investigation by Durham to plead guilty to charges of illegally doctoring information on a FISA warrant application for Trump campaign advisor Carter Page in 2016. Barr has been careful about setting expectations for additional indictments or guilty pleas.

"You need strong evidence of intent, it seems to me, before you can charge that kind of crime so developing that evidence is a time consuming process. Most of the people who are mouthing off about 'well why aren't these people already indicted,' they don't understand the criminal justice process. People get lawyers, sometimes they won't talk to you. Even if they talk to you they'll say they'll take the fifth and you have to get documents and frequently fight over documents and fight over things in court so the investigation is a cumbersome process. It's not something that can be done quickly," he continued.

Issues of cooperation can delay any investigation, but the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic also temporarily halted the ability for Durham to convene grand juries earlier this year. In addition, previous and lengthy investigations from DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz and Special Counsel Robert Mueller presented investigative conflicts, pushing back the Durham timeline.

"The other thing that people sometimes forget is that, you know, they may have in their own mind some thing that they think can be indicted but there are a lot of different allegations that have been made. A lot of people have sort of picked apart this and have come up with various theories. Part of what Durham has to do is sort of chase all of those down. That takes time. He didn't really get going until May or so [2019]. And then hired up people and started getting going. People forget that he didn't get access to the Horowitz stuff until December," Barr said. "When I hear people on TV saying, 'well we've had four years why nothing?' We haven't had four years. The first two years of the administration nothing was done at all. It was all investigating Trump and then Mueller went half of the way into the next year.In terms of investigations it's actually moving along but I know people are impatient," he continued.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: bagpipes; barr; bringthebagpipes; durhaminvestigation; eeyoresrfools; sweetsweetbagpipes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
Blah, Blah, Blah. Words are cheap and deeds are dear. "You need evidence of intent" Intent? I think I'll use that excuse the next time that I am stopped for speeding. "Gee officer, I had no intent to drive above the posted speed limit." Barr is a total waste. I thought that Sessions was bad but Barr is even worse.
1 posted on 09/14/2020 12:45:48 PM PDT by Shane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Shane
we'll be careful about not bringing indictments in a way that can be viewed as interfering with the election."

FUBB, you deep state hack

2 posted on 09/14/2020 12:49:13 PM PDT by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shane

Oddly, the feds don’t take that long to investigate and charge pubs.


3 posted on 09/14/2020 12:50:07 PM PDT by Fido969 (In)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

Barr can ESAD! Many of us took a lot of flack for saying this idiot was going to be better than Sessions and start punishing the Deep State. Barr is a blowhard who loves nothing better than to here himself talk and write up sternly-written memos.


4 posted on 09/14/2020 12:50:44 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shane
I thought that Sessions was bad but Barr is even worse.

Trust Sessions.
5 posted on 09/14/2020 12:51:06 PM PDT by TexasGunLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner
*going to be no better
6 posted on 09/14/2020 12:51:15 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

“””we’ll be careful about not bringing indictments in a way that can be viewed as interfering with the election.” “”””

Even though the investigation is due to the FBI, Clinton and the Hussein regime trying to influence an election through massive criminal behavior.


7 posted on 09/14/2020 12:51:42 PM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shane

RIGHT!!! Where was the Saturday supposed day of reckoning that the so called Informed were yapping about!
No one should post anything about this useless has been here. Except we got the 1st amendment so fire all the blanks some folks want to!


8 posted on 09/14/2020 12:53:40 PM PDT by Harpotoo (Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

Yep


9 posted on 09/14/2020 12:53:47 PM PDT by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Shane

Did anyone ask barr if Americans have a right to know what happened before the next election? It’s all about the political class, screw the electorate.


10 posted on 09/14/2020 12:54:12 PM PDT by JoSixChip (Its not about color, its about character.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

The illegal investigation IS STILL AFFECTING PRESIDENT TRUMP!!


11 posted on 09/14/2020 12:54:59 PM PDT by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Shane
"You need strong evidence of intent, it seems to me, before you can charge that kind of crime."

The DOJ didn't think it needed any strong evidence of intent when they charged everyone connected to Donald Trump. And Mr. Barr, what do you think the intent of the Mueller investigators was when they wiped all those phones of data?

12 posted on 09/14/2020 12:56:07 PM PDT by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shane

“One is to get to the bottom of what happened and get the facts out about that and we are going to do that and you know, try to be careful about that, that we don’t do anything that would unduly interfere with the election,”

The damned low life swamper. If the globalists, neocons, and intelligence community tried to sway and overturn the election, how in the hell is THAT not important for us to know BEFORE election day?

Barr sucks and is doing nothing. Durham too...


13 posted on 09/14/2020 12:56:14 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

So careful that they haven’t even bothered to bring evidence of wrongdoing to a Grand Jury!


14 posted on 09/14/2020 12:57:10 PM PDT by Oystir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Shane

efforts by the Department of Justice to ensure it remains non-political on the matter.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Like they did in the 2016 election............./s


15 posted on 09/14/2020 12:58:56 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents|Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shane

“You need strong evidence of intent, it seems to me, before you can charge that kind of crime so developing that evidence is a time consuming process. Most of the people who are mouthing off about ‘well why aren’t these people already indicted,’ they don’t understand the criminal justice process. People get lawyers, sometimes they won’t talk to you.”

Yeah A-hole. THAT is where 5am SWAT raids come in. Of course there haven’t been any. But on anyone even remotely associated with Trump there were SWAT raid on homes, accountants, and shockingly even on the law offices of Trumps ATTORNEYS!

And this turd Barr dares to go out there and say they just won’t talk to him, and he can’t find any evidence.


16 posted on 09/14/2020 12:59:08 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Yep, ask Steve Bannon about how fast they work.


17 posted on 09/14/2020 12:59:31 PM PDT by ClayinVA ("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Shane

18 posted on 09/14/2020 12:59:57 PM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

Barr was CIA and Durham has a history of whitewashing CIA illegality. Haspell was in charge of the London office when that area of the CIA was running wild framing Trump as a Russian spy.
She has run interference on every investigation.

We will get nothing outta this.


19 posted on 09/14/2020 1:01:26 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Shane

Hmmmm. Possibly:

A report before the election.
Indictments after the election.

Not what I was hoping for.


20 posted on 09/14/2020 1:02:34 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson