I don’t see the upside of one gang winning out over another because at the end of the day, neither group has a workable plan. They are both sh*tty. Wouldn’t it be easier to just say they are both sh*tty instead of getting all convoluted?
In Weimar Germany, IMO, the difference between the Nazis/Fascists and the Communists were pretty slight. The Communists wanted to take orders from Moscow. The Nazis were Nationalists. Beyond that, they were all Collectivists who were willing to do anything to grab power.
In America today, we have ANTIFA, BLM and they are basically Globalist Communists (Trotskyites, in my view). But they are not significantly different from Fascists. Horst Wessel would join them in a heartbeat.
To me - it always seemed that Liberals like creating Draconian situations. Then THEY can intervene to force THEIR policies into the equation and APPEAR as saviors for US.
It’s a sadly childish way of doing things... Predictable and lame, but then we ARE talking about Liberals!
An odd premise/analogy — there is no “fascist” front in America
The Left has taken arms against an otherwise docile country with a robust economy.
Bookmarked for later read