Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Roman_War_Criminal

It’s about time.
Why we put nukes into a muz country is baffling to me.


2 posted on 09/13/2020 5:24:42 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Neither safety nor security exists in nature. Everything is dangerous and has risk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BuffaloJack

Base has lost its importance over the years. Turkey was a NATO ally which gave the base stability. Now Turkey has shown its membership to be questionable. It is time to move out.


6 posted on 09/13/2020 5:35:08 AM PDT by Destroyer Sailor (Revenge is a dish best served col)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BuffaloJack

b/c they were anti communist when the USSR was actively threatening both Europe and the Med.

We should pull out of there, and it would absolutely be a tragedy if one of our nukes fell on Ankara as we departed.


12 posted on 09/13/2020 5:40:14 AM PDT by BTerclinger (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BuffaloJack

I suspect we will more to Jordan. Just a hunch.

JoMa


13 posted on 09/13/2020 5:40:34 AM PDT by joma89 (Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BuffaloJack

Turkey straddles Europe and Asia, and had a particularly important role for NATO because the Soviet ports in the Black Sea were only accessible through Turkey via the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits.


17 posted on 09/13/2020 5:49:30 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("We're human beings ... we're not f#%&ing animals." -- Dennis Rodman, 6/1/2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BuffaloJack

“Why we put nukes into a muz country is baffling to me.”

Worse than that, trying to transfer the weapons, over 50, from Incirlik is going to be a diplomatic and paperwork nightmare that is going to take a long time to get accomplished.. Both the Non-Aligned Movement and critics within NATO believe that NATO’s nuclear sharing violates Articles I and II of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which prohibit the transfer and the acceptance of direct or indirect control, respectively, over nuclear weapons. The United States insists that its forces control the weapons and that no transfer of the nuclear bombs or control over them is intended “unless and until a decision were made to go to war, at which the NPT would no longer be controlling”, so there is no breach of the NPT. And all the nations that wish will determine the movement as a precursor to war and fall into a defensive position....China, Russia, North Korea....long list. And it won’t make any difference as when the treaty was established in the 1960’s, there was mistrust then also. So now it’s going to be a diplomatic, I hope only, nightmare. Get ready for everyone to do a buildup on borders even worse than it is now....everyone’s.

rwood


32 posted on 09/13/2020 6:53:50 AM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BuffaloJack

Why we put nukes into a muz country is baffling to me.
````

At the time turkey was a secular muslim country with the emphasis on secular, but they always found a way to screw things up for us militarily by finding some regulation of new law than stopped something we needed in the cold war from happening.


35 posted on 09/13/2020 7:14:23 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson