Yeah.... you dummy. People tend to get a bit nervous when you come crashing through their gate in a highly threatening manner. Man.... these people are stupid.
Misourri has both castle doctrine type law and stand your ground type law, plus reaffirmation of guarantee of 2a rights in the state constitution.
I was just sent a summons to appear in court for trespassing on private property on Portland Pl aka the street Patricia and Mark McCloskey live on. I had a gun waved in my face by them but trespassing is what matters?
“They didnt have the right to break the security gate leading into the neighborhood.”
At that point, they went from being protesters to being rioters.
Words matter.
Ohun Ashe, when sentenced for various crimes, will be changing her name to “ Oh my ass”, and that will be in a women’s prison. Her nickname will be “Sweet cheeks”.
Don’t think she’ll such a “smart ass” in the future.
I am getting tired of these thugs having a voice on social media after they blatantly break the law. We are a nation gone asunder.
Through the cloud of rhetoric, most of you can see that a mob threatening and terrifying otherwise peaceful residents is a bad thing, especially on private property legally occupied by those residents. The McCloskeys probably could have handled the situation better, but I don’t blame them.
Self Defense Law in Missouri
Missouri expanded its so-called “stand your ground” law to include anywhere a person has the legal right to be. In other words, you do not have a duty to retreat from conflict even if you are outside your home or car. However, this does not mean self-defense is always an appropriate defense to homicide. You still cannot be the “initiator” of conflict, for example. But do these qualifiers also apply to Missouri’s castle doctrine?
Missouri’s Castle Doctrine
Just because Missouri has enacted a castle doctrine does not necessarily mean that a homeowner is justified in using deadly force against trespassers in all cases. Section 563.041 says that the use of deadly force is lawful when protecting against a reasonable fear of property damage or tampering “only when such use of deadly force is authorized under other sections of this chapter.”
This refers to section 563.031.2, which states: “A person shall not use deadly force upon another person . . . unless such force is used against a person who unlawfully enters, remains after unlawfully entering, or attempts to unlawfully enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle lawfully occupied by such person.”
That would appear to say homeowners can use deadly force against any trespassers.
Once again, the attackers are treated with kid gloves and the victims (defenders) are charged with a felony and must spend millions to defend themselves from a criminal government.
JoMa
Now thats privledge....thinking you can do whatever you want without any consequences.
TRESPASSING?? OMG...how about JAY WALKING ALSO??
Solution to the mob when its only you and a few being harassed, FLAMETHROWER
If there were 300 threatening the McKloskey’s that day, why are only 9 summonsed? Weren’t the hooligans being led by a future congresscritter with a bull horn?
BLM = lesbian, marxist, satanists. Stand with BLM; you stand with the devil.