Maher: There Is Belief on ‘Far Left’ That Property Destruction Is ‘Justifiable’

Breitbart ^ | 09/12/2020 | Ian Hanchett

[Redwood71]

“What we are now seeing is the militant version.”

Everything evolves...or dies. These hippies you are seeing now have lost their benefactor parents and are now rebelling against a system the rest of the nation has been effective with for generations and they don’t fit in.

Hunger and homelessness can create a lot of changes. Everything from substituting living for dope from not having anything to lose, to get things through harm until they die trying. And even with their lives, they have nothing to lose and no way to get anywhere. And those they identify with, don’t care if they live or die after November. They can go away and be replaced just like a spark plug. And the engine continues to run without them because they have lowered themselves into the level of collateral merchandise. And in all the years it took them to get there, they never listened to anyone that was telling them they were headed off the cliff.

rwood

[SaxxonWoods]

Wait. I just saw a phrase one NEVER sees in print or any media.

“Far Left”.

I didn’t know there was such a designation.

[seowulf]

How do you get property?

You sell a piece of your life to your employer for 8 hours a day, to do things that you would not choose to do.

He gives you money that you use to buy property.

When someone steal or destroys your property, they are in effect making you their slave.

[ridesthemiles]

IIRC, 189 low income housing units under final stages of construction were burned down in Minneapolis.

When you are destroying your own housing, you are more than a little mentally unbalanced.

Every one should be shot on sight.

[ridesthemiles]

Too many of these stupid Liberals think that INSURANCE pays for all of the damage.

NOT TRUE

The first of the looting & destruction in Minneapolis burned out businesses that were mostly hiring blacks. They destroyed their own jobs & their own sources for supplies.

[ridesthemiles]

Spanking them got banned.

Shooting them is coming.

[Ancesthntr]

When you steal or destroy someone’s property, you have effectively enslaved them for the amount of time that it took that person to buy or build that property. A house or a business, that’s 20+ years of their labor that you stole.

If these people can riot - burning, looting and murdering (BLM) - for slavery that didn’t even get imposed on their grandparents’ grandparents, then they can fully expect that their intended victims will use lethal force to prevent their own enslavement. Someone willing to destroy another person’s life’s work is showing by their own actions that they care less about their own life than about destroying someone else’s property.

[Ancesthntr]

“ And their women were...well, friendly.”
———————
....and used, and smelly (just like the hippies). Nope, nope, nope.

[Ancesthntr]

You loved Cowboys and Indians as a kid; you thrilled to “Cowboys vs. Aliens; you watched the Cowboys vs. Moslems reality show for nearly 20 years. Now the ultimate in entertainment is coming to your home - literally TO YOUR HOME - on November 3rd, as Alinsky Obama productions, in partnership with Soros Ventures brings you the live-action adventure of a lifetime, “COWBOYS vs. COMMIES!” Don’t miss it ... because they won’t miss you!

[ought-six]

Well, maybe you were never 18, in the late 1960s.

[Republican Wildcat]

Over 60% of College Democrats in a survey stated they believe looting and rioting is acceptable conduct. This is becoming a fully mainstream belief among Democrats.

[loveliberty2]

Tired of having the fruits of their labors confiscated by an overpowering British government, America's Founders declared themselves free and independent. Most American schoolchildren can recite their claim that, ". . . all men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights ... to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."

Less familiar, however, are these lines from their Declaration of Independence:

"He ( King George III ) has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance .... He has combined with others to subject us, ... imposing taxes on us without our consent."

What, then, did the Founders consider to be the real cornerstone of man's liberty and happiness? On what basic premise did they devise their Constitution? Let them speak for themselves:

"The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God ... anarchy and tyranny commence. PROPERTY MUST BE SECURED OR LIBERTY CANNOT EXIST" -John Adams

"Government is instituted to protect property of every sort .... This being the end of government, that is NOT a just government,... nor is property secure under it, where the property which a man has ... is violated by arbitrary seizures of one class of citizens for the service of the rest." -James Madison

Their guiding principle was that people come together to form governments in order to SECURE their rights to property - not to create an entity which wilt, itself, "take from the mouths of labor the bread it has earned." What was wrong for individual citizens to do to one another, they believed, was equally wrong for government to do to them. The right to own property and to keep the rewards of individual labor opened the floodgates of progress for the benefit of the entire human race. Millions have fled other countries to participate in the Miracle of America.

---

Footnote: Our Ageless Constitution, W. David Stedman & La Vaughn G. Lewis, Editors (Asheboro, NC, W. David Stedman Associates, 1987) Part III: ISBN 0-937047-01-5

[Kickass Conservative]

Deep Thoughts...

[nonsporting]

... there is a belief “on the far left,” that property destruction “is sort of [a] justifiable ...

There is a principle in law that deadly force can be use to defend property. Where implemented order follows.

[EBH]

I think one also must consider what ‘earning’ property does to the psyche vs. being ‘given’ the bread one puts in your mouth.

Pursuit of happiness, this is the pursuit of things that affect our overall well-being. Be it a business, property, job, way of life, religion, personal/public safety etc. Destroying a person’s life work...business, statue, feeling of safety is in effect ripping at the very fabric of what it means to be a United States citizen.

To literally devalue the person. There is a massive moment of grief that many will not recover from. Not only the loss of the property, the work, the jobs...but of the trust within the community. These actions will cause far more death than any insurance company can pay for. This is the myth of their actions and attitudes.

It is just property ...it can be replaced. Uh, no. No it cannot just be replaced. And it is not reparations. Your rights stopped the moment you infringed on your entire communities pursuit of happiness. Your actions will cause more death than one bad cop.