Posted on 09/11/2020 8:15:05 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Will Blues and Grays become Blues and Reds?
Yeah, ummmm.... their side is packed and clustered in tight spaces, cannot feed themselves, have no supply lines, and have zero experience with shooting at any range beyond 10 ft. Our side has more long-range firearms, can feed itself, has long supply chains aplenty, experience in killing 400+ pound animals at 100 yds, and is spread out across an area 80 times larger.
Logistics alone says that this won't be a long, drawn-out contest... and that's long before we get into the fragility of the young coddled white kids who think they're storming the beach at Normandy for crowding and assaulting people and police who haven't fought back.... yet...
And we have combat experienced veterans.
The same woman who four years ago said that not accepting the results of the election is a direct threat to our democracy.
Hell, it started before Obozo was evicted from the WH!
HITLER’S ANGRY! IT ALWAYS STARTS AT THE TOP!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dueC8wSDZoRJ/
That should read WHEN Trump wins...
Oh, don't tease us.
(Just leave behind San Diego/North Island and Kitsap Naval bases)
Its easy to see.
The side that insists on changing our voting process to the most insecure means possible despite the fact that both government appointed epidemiologists Fauci and Birx say voting in person is perfectly fine, is the side that is planning on fraud and usurpation.
I can only hope that the Justice Department will have adequate monitoring of states that allow mail in voting to ensure the integrity of the vote.
Al Franken vs Norm Coleman II
This article could have been published four years ago.
Madd Dog Mattis already plotted that and he is by no means alone.
the Left ALWAYS accuses everybody else of doing exactly as they intend. ALWAYS!!
Situation normal then.
They have no intention of letting Trump (and US) win again.
I think it is going to go a lot smoother than people think.
Because it was so close in 2016, they can call it illegitimate without disrespecting the voters...
By saying they won the popular vote - by saying the electoral college is flawed - by saying long a couple thousand votes in key swing states could have changed the outcome - they are saying they lost over a mere technicality.
They can say they should have won without ever questioning the collective judgment of the voters.
In 2020, they may not be able to do that.
If President Trump wins the popular vote, and wins the swing states more decisively, as I believe he will, they wont be able to say it was close, or that they lost on a technicality - they will have to blame the voters.
If they refuse to accept the results of a clear victory - they may as well be calling the voters stupid - which is not a good look.
I suspect a decisive victory in the popular vote, say, 53-47, and an electoral college score above 350 - that will shut them up for a while.
But if they dont shut up, and they choose to call a majority of the American people names, such as deplorables, low information voters, or just racists, the Democrat party will find itself left out in the cold.
Voters dont like it when a political party insults them.
Bring it.
We have all the guns AND people who know how to use them accurately. Not a few thugs with 38 specials that are more likely to kill each other.
>>Logistics alone says that this won’t be a long, drawn-out contest<<
Yep. Block the bridges to Manhattan Island and the 101, 5, 10 and 405 around L.A. (the 2 is already in good hands). Same for the 70. Stop all trains.
That does it for the blue cities. Once they are done eating their corn seed they will just die of starvation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.