Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr
It’s the price paid for handling and a ride that isn’t land-yacht levels of seasickness inducing.

I have spent most of my life in mid-sized to large cars that sported 14-15 inch tires. I find that the full size GMs (Roadmaster, old Caprices, Olds 98, old Impalas, etc.), Fords (Crown Vic/Grand Marquis), Chryslers ('60s 300s, Diplomats/5th Ave. M-Bodies) all had a SMOOTH, COFMORTABLE land yacht ride, the OPPOSITE of sea sickness. I am astonished that low profile tires are sacrificing comfort and making the suspension do all the work, rather than the tires.
47 posted on 09/09/2020 5:53:11 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Sivana

I had a 64 Dart and a 68 Cadillac Sixty Special and have driven many of the vehicles you mention. In fact, the last of the land yachts is parked out front, a 94 Cadillac Fleetwood that belongs to a friend. All of them could have seasickness induced through driving in modern Dallas traffic; note that the marketplace has basically agreed with this. We retrofitted the Caddy with better shocks, springs, bushings and tires to moderate the boat action.

Also, Jaguar produced superior ride and handling by using stiff sidewall tires and letting the suspension deal with it long before the current era - without nausea, so it not only could be done but was.


48 posted on 09/09/2020 7:00:25 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson