Of course we didn’t get to see the President at the White House w/Serbia and Kosovo leaders and hear about the deal because Joe Biden chose that exact time to speak today (lying constantly as per usual and answering planted questions by the “reporters” all geared to give Biden an opportunity to slam Trump). All the cable channels carried Biden’s attack speech rather than the Trump/Serbia/Kosovo leaders and their economic deal.
Biden is going to schedule as many of his little speeches from somewhere in Delaware, as often as possible to preempt any White House event that includes Trump and is held during the day. Mark my words.
I didn't see a thread on Biden's pathetic speech today. So I'm opining here that his oratory was weak, rambling, false and uninspiring as usual....it was everything I expected.
However, what actually pulled my cork was the after-speech critique that "Fox political editor" Chris Stirewalt, offered to viewers.
Stirewalt confined his weak analysis to only one, maybe two of Biden's lies, smears and incoherencies, completely ignoring the main fact that the hand-picked reporter's questions to the candidate were pre-planned.
Not only that, Sloppy Joe had all the pre-planned answers on the teleprompters at his sides and on the note papers under his nose.
I wonder if Biden's handlers actually believed that TV viewers wouldn't catch this ruse.
Immediately pointing out this ruse is ALL that Stirewalt would have had to say in his commentary......it would have summed up the whole speech in about three sentences, and we wouldn't have had to listen to Stirewalt's lame "analysis" which actually never laid a finger on Biden and which was nothing more than a disjointed word salad, signifying nothing.
Is this the best Fox can do in analyzing a presidential candidate's speech?
And whose side is Stirewalt on, anyhow. I, for one, have never trusted him as far as I could throw him.
But to NOT point out the set-up surrounding Biden's attempt to con the American people today is inexcusable.
Leni