Why just oral and anal? Gay agenda?
Of course it’s the gay agenda... How else are they going to recruit new members?
Exactly. Gay men were upset that straight men who had sex with underage girls were offered leniency in the sex offender registry and they weren't.
This might be the California version of a "Romeo and Juliet" exception where older teenagers who consensually engage in sexual activity are not held to the same standard as child predators (teachers, coaches, parents, aunts, uncles). I assume age of consent is still 18 in California. In many states it's 16.
Why just oral and anal? Gay agenda?
**************************************
Most definitely appears that way.
Because Weiner, the author of the bill, can suck start a leaf blower. It would never occur to him to include those ucky breeder things.
Kids wont become gay in large enough numbers with only fatherless or poor father households, they need to be raped to have a higher rate.