Interesting Twitter post on Durham expected indictments

Twitter ^ | 08/29/2020 | Greg Rubini

[little jeremiah]

Ole’ Lindsey locks him into story, like the Clinton’s did in Arkansas.

Lindsey Graham has to scrub certain things from the case.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

LIttle Tony Smary Pants thinks that Grahamnasty can control what the DoJ has on Pientka. Ha ha! As though investigators have not wrung Pientka dry already.

[bagster]

Blah blah blah....ppl should already be in jail.....tired of these teases....want action already.

[bagster]

[bagster]

No cynics please, but skeptics are appropriately welcome.

You got to be a cynic and then some to not be able to look around and realize that something's happening here.

What it is, ain't exactly clear.

[hardspunned]

I assume you’d say the same thing about Warner and Burr on the Intel Committee. Coordinating the coverup among the the prime suspects and the corrupt enabling politicians of both parties has nothing to do with Durham’s investigation? If you can’t see conspiracy at the highest level of the GOP after these last four years, you’re not watching the same swamp I am.

[bagster]

Graham was just coordinating the further cover up.

Graham is irrelevant. The Senate committee can only refer do DOJ.

There is a proper criminal investigation under way already.

If anything, Graham was being exploratory for the enemy. The want to know very badly what Durham has.

Don't sweat Graham. That derp can't stop anything.

[Oystir]

Indictments only come from a Grand Jury. There is absolutely no information that Durham is presenting evidence to a GJ. No GJ, no indictments. There is no “tick tock.” Fitton knows there is no GJ.

[MayflowerMadam]

“Trump is in the White House. He’s not going anywhere.”

I pray you’re right! If he loses, we’ll never hear another word about the worst political crimes in U.S. history. It won’t even make the history books.

[MayflowerMadam]

“He’s being interviewed by a Senate Committee for over an hour.”

What authority does a Senate Committee have to punish evildoers? Can they indict, prosecute, sentence, etc.?

[bagster]

[bagster]

Snivelers and poobutts take notice. When the indictments happen you will owe the rest of us many many apologies and will be called upon often for such thread after thread just like your whining....thread after thread.

We ougghta mark their foreheads with the scarlet P, for poobutt just in case they try to pretend they knew it all along.

That's their m.o.

Think Inglorious Basterds.

[smvoice]

I was about to say me, too, but I read a few posts past you and..well..the down & out bus tour is pulling into this thread.

[bagster]

So again the bottom line is I predicted months ago August 31 Monday is when the shiite starts going down we’ll see

The timing of the storm has been locked in for at least three years. This plan has been worked up with military precision.

I think you're in the ballpark.

[bagster]

I assume you’d say the same thing about Warner and Burr on the Intel Committee. Coordinating the coverup among the the prime suspects and the corrupt enabling politicians of both parties has nothing to do with Durham’s investigation? If you can’t see conspiracy at the highest level of the GOP after these last four years, you’re not watching the same swamp I am.

Oh, we know the level of Republican derpitude.

It only takes one derp on a committee to leak to the enemy. And there are several.

This is why Barr doesn't give things up to the derp Senate. That would be like handing all his evidence to Hillary, Comey, Brennan, or Obama.

The point is, if Durham is conducting criminal investigations, Senate hearings are irrelevant and redundant. The only use for them is to get things said on television or create perjury traps.

[bagster]

Indictments only come from a Grand Jury. There is absolutely no information that Durham is presenting evidence to a GJ. No GJ, no indictments. There is no “tick tock.” Fitton knows there is no GJ.

No he doesn't. And neither do you or I.

Wishing it so doesn't make it so.

Grownups are handling this investigation. Not Tom Fitton.

[AnthonySoprano]

.
No.

They can refer someone for Prosecution - refer to the DOJ.

Comey’s been referred over and over - and nothing.

‘

[MayflowerMadam]

Thanks. So a Senate investigation COULD give positive results (for us), but it doesn’t happen often. We’ll see...

[cherry]

yeah...here's hoping....but we've been there, down that....

I'm still wondering how Toon got away all that he did as governor....and having a nose like a vacuum....

[Liz]

This makes Mueller and company outright thieves b/c they willfully pocketed
tax dollars knowing they could not fulfill the mandate they were given.

============================

Mueller knew no evidence of collusion against Trump from day one, Devin Nunes says
Fox News ^ | May 22 2019 | Charles Creitz / FR Posted by knighthawk

Special Counsel Robert Mueller knew from the beginning of the Russia investigation that there was no evidence of collusion against the Trump presidential campaign, U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes said Wednesday.

Nunes, a California Republican and ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, said on Fox News' "Hannity" that Mueller knew then-candidate Donald Trump did not collude with the Russians to win the 2016 election. "He knew the day he walked in the door, he knew the day he walked in the door that there was no evidence of collusion," Nunes told host Sean Hannity. (Excerpt) more at foxnews.com ...

[bagster]

Comey’s been referred over and over - and nothing.

So you say.

Your only evidence being a negative attitude.