Posted on 08/28/2020 10:15:46 AM PDT by BlueHorseShoe
1/11 THREAD...
https://twitter.com/gregrubini/status/1299325921233645570?s=21
1. BIG NEWS: is Joe Pientka now a Cooperating Witness for John Durham? [THREAD under development]
I think he is. Comey, McCabe & Strzok in BIG trouble.
please Retweet, and follow the THREAD while I'm writing it
Thank you, Catherine Herridge!
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Ole Lindsey locks him into story, like the Clintons did in Arkansas.
Lindsey Graham has to scrub certain things from the case.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
LIttle Tony Smary Pants thinks that Grahamnasty can control what the DoJ has on Pientka. Ha ha! As though investigators have not wrung Pientka dry already.
You got to be a cynic and then some to not be able to look around and realize that something's happening here.
What it is, ain't exactly clear.
I assume youd say the same thing about Warner and Burr on the Intel Committee. Coordinating the coverup among the the prime suspects and the corrupt enabling politicians of both parties has nothing to do with Durhams investigation? If you cant see conspiracy at the highest level of the GOP after these last four years, youre not watching the same swamp I am.
Graham is irrelevant. The Senate committee can only refer do DOJ.
There is a proper criminal investigation under way already.
If anything, Graham was being exploratory for the enemy. The want to know very badly what Durham has.
Don't sweat Graham. That derp can't stop anything.
Indictments only come from a Grand Jury. There is absolutely no information that Durham is presenting evidence to a GJ. No GJ, no indictments. There is no “tick tock.” Fitton knows there is no GJ.
“Trump is in the White House. Hes not going anywhere.”
I pray you’re right! If he loses, we’ll never hear another word about the worst political crimes in U.S. history. It won’t even make the history books.
“Hes being interviewed by a Senate Committee for over an hour.”
What authority does a Senate Committee have to punish evildoers? Can they indict, prosecute, sentence, etc.?
We ougghta mark their foreheads with the scarlet P, for poobutt just in case they try to pretend they knew it all along.
That's their m.o.
Think Inglorious Basterds.
I was about to say me, too, but I read a few posts past you and..well..the down & out bus tour is pulling into this thread.
The timing of the storm has been locked in for at least three years. This plan has been worked up with military precision.
I think you're in the ballpark.
Oh, we know the level of Republican derpitude.
It only takes one derp on a committee to leak to the enemy. And there are several.
This is why Barr doesn't give things up to the derp Senate. That would be like handing all his evidence to Hillary, Comey, Brennan, or Obama.
The point is, if Durham is conducting criminal investigations, Senate hearings are irrelevant and redundant. The only use for them is to get things said on television or create perjury traps.
No he doesn't. And neither do you or I.
Wishing it so doesn't make it so.
Grownups are handling this investigation. Not Tom Fitton.
.
No.
They can refer someone for Prosecution - refer to the DOJ.
Comeys been referred over and over - and nothing.
Thanks. So a Senate investigation COULD give positive results (for us), but it doesn’t happen often. We’ll see...
I'm still wondering how Toon got away all that he did as governor....and having a nose like a vacuum....
============================
Mueller knew no evidence of collusion against Trump from day one, Devin Nunes says
Fox News ^ | May 22 2019 | Charles Creitz / FR Posted by knighthawk
Special Counsel Robert Mueller knew from the beginning of the Russia investigation that there was no evidence of collusion against the Trump presidential campaign, U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes said Wednesday.
Nunes, a California Republican and ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, said on Fox News' "Hannity" that Mueller knew then-candidate Donald Trump did not collude with the Russians to win the 2016 election. "He knew the day he walked in the door, he knew the day he walked in the door that there was no evidence of collusion," Nunes told host Sean Hannity. (Excerpt) more at foxnews.com ...
So you say.
Your only evidence being a negative attitude.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.