Interesting Twitter post on Durham expected indictments

Twitter ^ | 08/29/2020 | Greg Rubini

[BlueHorseShoe]

1/11 THREAD...

https://twitter.com/gregrubini/status/1299325921233645570?s=21

1. BIG NEWS: is Joe Pientka now a Cooperating Witness for John Durham? [THREAD under development]

I think he is. Comey, McCabe & Strzok in BIG trouble.

please Retweet, and follow the THREAD while I'm writing it

Thank you, Catherine Herridge!

[bagster]

A thirst for truth is vital, which takes some humility.

Exactly.

And a lot of these codgers have built extravagant sand castles in their mind and nothing can penetrate the walls.

Their pride will not allow it.

Just look at Puker. All of a sudden he is talking about Duham not having anything to do with Q or Sessions. Not too long ago he was all like 'Durham ain't gonna do nothin'. He's a derp state derp sent in to bury the investigation'.

Now he hears footsteps and is on team Durham. Funny how that works.

I call this the "I knew it all along" syndrome.

[bagster]

Your statement proves my point totally.

Puker, you haven't had a valid point since I've known you.

And you only get worse. Whatever point of yours you think I proved is just another foolishness. I won't even ask what point you're talking about.

Arguing with small minds is tiresome for the wise.

[GOPJ]

Joe Pientka now a Cooperating Witness...

good... a start...

[Grimmy]

Tom Fitton was not too positive/optimistic about Durham on the Howie Carr Show yesterday.

************

For all that Fitton has accomplished, and the battle he’s been fighting, he’s still an outsider looking in.

And he’s most accustomed to the old reality where leaks were legion and what was going on behind the curtain was being spilled out through a plethora of rents and tears in the curtain.

Trump went to war on the leak machine first thing in his admin.

This ain’t then. Then ain’t now.

The same leak system doesn’t exist anymore. Fitton can *not* know what’s going on behind the curtain. And in some minds not knowing, not being able to see, when so long accustomed to being able to see means there’s nothing to see.

Because, if there was something there worth seeing, they’d be seeing it. And since they can’t, there’s no there there.

[Okeydoker]

Your delusional confirmation bias is why most FR folk think q people are seriously crazy. They do nothing to disabuse the notion.

The Qult has probably driven more interesting people from the site over the last two years than any other single reason.

Enabling the q anon has serious damaged the FR brand. Over time it will get better of course.

[little jeremiah]

“It was you, not I , that said the date has been locked in for three years.”

Bagster said that the timing is part of the long term plan, but he did not say that he knows what the planned timing is. AG Barr said something general about “around labor day” would be some indictments or news in that regard. Lemme see what I can find. BTW this “policy” meantioned below is not a federal law or statute, and generally is considered to refer only to presidential candidates. IOW this “policy” is not carved in stone.

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/08/06/ex-colleagues_see_durham_dropping_bombshells_before_labor_day_124753.html

While much speculation inside the Beltway says U.S. Attorney John Durham will punt the results of his so-called Spygate investigation past the election to avoid charges of political interference, sources who have worked with Durham on past public corruption cases doubt he’ll bend to political pressure — and they expect him to drop bombshells before Labor Day.

Durham’s boss, Attorney General Bill Barr, also pushed back on the notion his hand-picked investigator would defer action. Under Democratic questioning on Capitol Hill last week, he refused to rule out a pre-election release.

“Under oath, do you commit to not releasing any report by Mr. Durham before the November election?” Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell (D-Fla.) asked Barr, citing longstanding Justice Department policy not to announce new developments in politically sensitive cases before an election.

“No,” the attorney general curtly replied.

Justice Department policy prohibits prosecutors from taking overt steps in politically charged cases typically within 60 days of an election. Accordingly, Durham would have to make a move by the Friday before Labor Day, or Sept. 4.

[More at link]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Here’s another bit:

https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/ag-barr-doesnt-rule-out-durham-probe-indictments-dropping-just-before-presidential-election/

Attorney General Bill Barr signaled that an ongoing investigation into the origins of the probe into Russian electoral interference and possible ties with members of the Trump 2016 presidential campaign could bear fruit as late as the eve of the 2020 presidential election.

Speaking with conservative radio talk show host Hugh Hewitt on Tuesday, Barr was asked a series of questions about the Russiagate genesis probe currently being led by Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham, infamous in the legal community for leading two separate investigations that whitewashed the Central Intelligence Agency’s use and coverup of torture during the second Bush administration.

“The investigation of U.S. Attorney John Durham into the circumstances surrounding the surveillance of President Trump’s campaign, transition and early administration, does that investigation remain on track, undisturbed by the virus?” Hewitt asked.

“Yes,” Barr replied.

“There are guidelines concerning the announcement of indictments or closing of investigations prior to the election,” Hewitt continued–getting to the heart of the matter. “When is that deadline for U.S. Attorney Durham and do you think he will make it? Either to disclose indictments or to disclose that the investigation is over?”

“As far as I’m aware, none of the key people that–whose actions are being reviewed at this point are running for president,” Barr said.

“But would not the announcement of indictments after a time certain have an impact on the election of the sort that the U.S. Attorney’s Manual recommends against?” Hewitt pressed.

“Well, what is the sort that the manual recommends against?” Barr asked.

“As I recall, this came up with director Comey making his announcement and the concerns in 2016 that he had acted improvidently during the run-up to the election. I don’t recall what the exact timing is,” Hewitt explained.

“Yeah, but that was directly as to a candidate,” Barr noted.

[More at link]

Addendum: I direclty heard AG Barr say that “as of today”, he hasn’t seen evidence indicating that any presidential candidates are under investigation. Very cagey and carefully crafted response.

[BlueHorseShoe]

Never said Clinesmith was part of a GJ. In fact he couldn’t have been since the news about his involvement was first broken in 2017.

[little jeremiah]

I hope you are not suggesting that the actions of mr durham, appointed not that long ago by AG BARR actually are part of the Q PLAN that they claim jeff sessions started.

I know q just keeps inventing things to take credit for but whatever durham does has nothing to do with sessions, or q.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Durham was appointed in October 2017. And funny thing you keep saying things as though you are a mystic who Knows All.

[little jeremiah]

Interesting; Pientka has been invisible since this whole things started; it has been considered by a lot of people that he has been cooperating with Durham.

[Okeydoker]

So one of your people said the Big Event is set for August 31.
Bagster thereafter stated “ the date has been locked in for three years”.

So are you now saying that the Aug 31 date IS NOT the date of the Big Event?

( this wouldn’t surprise me of course since I have two years worth of date changes when things donT happen.)

[Okeydoker]

My understanding is that Q knows all. Or at least that’s what we have all been told these many years.

[bagster]

While the public may not know of a seated GJ, witnesses, reporters and attorneys certainly do know.

Unless Durham and his lawyers met with DOJ in the deep woods in the dark of night, then the same applies to him as to a grand jury.

And there were no leaks.

You seem very sure there are no grand juries empaneled. do you also believe that there won't be?

And if so, what do you base that on?

Here is a nice article on the matter. Grand juries are mentioned.

Seven big hints Barr has dropped about Durham’s investigation of the Russia investigators

(excerpt)

Barr told Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo on Sunday that the coronavirus has slowed Durham’s ability to interview witnesses and use a grand jury if needed, though he did not officially confirm there was grand jury activity in the case.

Make of that what you will.

But I dispute your contention that if there was a grand jury empaneled, we would necessarily know about it.

Either way, there will be and there will be charge. Lots of charges.

[little jeremiah]

I find it significant that 0krapuker’s attacks on Q and Q readers is precisely the same as the MSM’s position. Exactly the same.

Almsot as if Okrapuker and the MSM were on the same team....odd. Of course the say Okra showed up I saw him and realized that he is playing for the other side. Every comment, consistently.

[bagster]

Well told, Mr. Grimmy.

[little jeremiah]

CORRECTION:

Of course the DAY Okra showed up I saw him and realized that he is playing for the other side. Every comment, consistently.

[little jeremiah]

One of “my” people”? WTF? I do not “have” people.

[Okeydoker]

Yeah, rocket scientist, the mainstream media hangs on my every word and then reprints What I say each night.

You’ve got some serious mental issues boy.

And you guys wonder why the rest of us think you are unstable.

[hardspunned]

Too funny!

[FreeReign]

FWIW

[mac_truck]

You’ve got some serious mental issues boy.

Pretty sure little Jemima is female, but yeah.