What is fascinating(and sick) is the method: they have ai take profiles of the ENTIRE jury population, and then the jury sub pool is created by the software to contain 90% plus of the desired profile(ie rabid leftest), which then is used for the final jury selection so they can get a conviction of an enemy OR acquittal of one of their own. The profile data used by the ai comes from all the info the government databases have on individuals. The diabolic nature of it is that only the person running the software knows what is going on, even the spiked jurors are unaware why they were truly selected. I will point out as they did in the video it is OBVIOUS when it happens because a statistical check of the final jury shows it is NOT a random or normal cross section of the actual original full jury population.
Jury selection is a bad idea. The judge should ask two questions. Do you know the plaintiff? The defendant? No? Get in the box.
Diversity and knowledge in the jury. Less wasted time of potential jurors. Too bad for the lawyers.