Posted on 08/12/2020 11:37:14 PM PDT by rintintin
On Tuesday, Donald Trump referred to Kamala Harris as a “nasty woman”, referencing her 2018 grilling of Brett Kavanaugh over allegations – denied by Kavanaugh – that the now supreme court justice attempted to rape Dr Christine Blasey Ford when they were teenagers. Nasty or “not nice” seem to be words Trump reserves for women who hold men in power to account: Trump similarly insulted Hilary Clinton during the 2016 election race, when she hinted at his reluctance to publish his tax returns. Trump also ordered female reporters who question him to “be nice” and has previously said it was not “nice” to call a woman “tough”.
(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...
Just because ya got power and influence don’t mean you’re smart or have good taste.
Btw, the interior is rotting and it reeks.
No, it is because President Trump knows that the left will attempt to protect her and in doing so have to report on things Harris has done in the past. Things the media would rather not have to report on.
Regardless of how the media frames it, Kamilla Harris will forever more be known as “Nasty Harris” and the reason why she earned that title.
More like “She got drilled by powerful men”.
What is a Poppy Noor?
She throws men into prison and viciously attacked the Kavanaugh family. She blows powerful men, but that’s probably not part of this crap.
And, of course, she doesn’t have even one. I don’t like to call women bitches, but for her, I will gladly make an exception. She is a B I T C H. 😁👍
Booker was nasty too.
Kamala said USSC Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation was a “sham” and “disgrace,” .... “that it denied justice to every survivor of sexual assault.
Then, why the rats in charge of California and Kamal Harris did not and will not fund the DNA testing of thousands of DNA/ID rape kit in California while Kamal was our state AG
“Re Unprocessed DNA/ID rape kits in California while Kamala Harris was the state AG!”
“Kamala Harris protected a lot rapists while serving as California’s AG! By not funding to run those DNA/Rape Id kits
If she had done her job as our state AG, there would not be hundreds if not thousands of DNA/ID rape Kits not processed due to quote lack of funding.
Maybe some females in California and the nation can bring this scandal forward after Kamala conveniently forgot about them.
CA ‘DNA/ID’ backlog under fire Capitol Weekly | Capitol Weekly ...
capitol weekly.net/rape-kit-backlog-under-fire/
Apr 11, 2018 - Thousands of California women who said they were raped gave [permission to use Rape Kit tests on them ... But many of the DNA/ID rape kits were not examined in a timely way, caught in a so called Budget Crunch.
No one knows how many untested DNA/ID rape kits there were/are in California ...
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-sac-rape-kits-legislation-20170525-story.html
May 26, 2017 - Assembly Bill 41 would require law enforcement agencies to report to the state how many sexual assault DNA/ID kits they collected and have examined ...
The unconscionable backlog of unprocessed rape kits in California ...
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-rape-kits-20180521-story.html
May 21, 2018 - The DNA/ID rape kit backlog is, unfortunately, not a new problem, though ... that the procedure will further the investigation, not just add to a collection of ...
Destroyed: How the trashing of DNA/ID rape kits failed victims and jeopardizes … those victims.
www.cnn.com/interactive/2018/11/investigates/police-destroyed-rapekits/index.html
Nov 29, 2018 - Where police did not redact that information, CNN did, including the full names of ... A CNN investigation into the destruction of DNA/ID rape kits in dozens of agencies ..... of Prosecuting Attorneys and a career California prosecutor.
‘Disturbing’ DNA/ID rape kit investigation prompts action - CNN - CNN.com
https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/05/health/ DNA/ID rape-kits-destroyed-reaction.../index.html
Dec 5, 2018 - A CNN investigation prompts officials to tell police: Do not destroy rape kits.
For someone, who had taken an oath to uphold, support, and defend the Constitution throughout her professional career, 2020 Democratic presidential contender Sen. Kamala Harris tends to, in the words of constitutionalist and talk host Mark Levin, “treat it like a smorgasbord,” picking the parts she likes and ignoring the parts she doesn’t.
Like not funding to process/id maybe thousands of Rape ID Kits in California while serving as the state’s highest ranking law enforcement person, the state’s former AG, Kamala!
Will she be even better as our Vice President?
Or true
Joe Biden is equally an a&&hole
Senator Biden was the first questioner. Instead of the softball questions he’d promised to ask, he threw a beanball straight at my head, quoting from a speech I’d given four years earlier at the Pacific Legal Foundation and challenging me to defend what I’d said. ”I find attractive the arguments of scholars such as Stephen Macedo, who defend an activist Supreme Court that would strike down laws restricting property rights.” That caught me off guard, and I had no recollection of making so atypical a statement, which shook me up even more. “Now, it would seem to me what you were talking about,” Senator Biden went on to say, “is you find it attractive the fact that they are activists and they would like to strike down existing laws that impact on restricting the use of property rights, because you know, that is what they write about.”pp 235-236 of "My Grandfather's Son" by Clarence ThomasSince I didn’t remember making the statement in the first place, I didn’t know how to respond to it. All I could say in reply was that “it has been some time since I have read Professor Macedo … But I don’t believe that in my writings I have indicated that we should have an activist Supreme Court.” It was, I knew, a weak answer. Fortunately, though, the young lawyers who had helped prepare me for the hearing had loaded all of my speeches into a computer and at the first break in the proceedings they looked this one up. The senator, they found, had wrenched my words out of context. I looked at the text and saw that the passage he’d read out loud had been immediately followed by two other sentences: “But the libertarian argument overlooks the place of the Supreme Court in a scheme of separation of powers. One does not strengthen self-government and the rule of law by having the non-democratic branch of the government make policy.” The point I’d been making was the opposite of the one that Senator Biden claimed I had made.
>> Though Monica expected no advancement in payment.
Monica was told that Bill was going to leave his wife for her
“Is it because she grills powerful men?”
The Guardian spelled “blows” wrong.
Oh, she grills them alright.
Are we supposed to take anything serious from a man hating “Journalist” named Poppy? Uhhhh big NO!
He He
"Don't target Harris, just utterly and completely ignore her and every word she says. If the media brings Harris up or asks you a question about some attack she made, just wave your hand dismissively and say "I'm running against Joe Biden, go talk to Mike Pence if you're interested in the VP conteste." You only diminish yourself and take your eyes off real target by wasting time and giving attention to what amounts to the 2nd fiddle wannabe."
If you mean by grills powerful men that she uses her teeth, well... yes
Hmmmmm
Actually there is another word that is a better fit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.