Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Considering the Durham timeline
Conservative Treehouse ^ | 08/06/2020 | Sundance

Posted on 08/06/2020 8:43:03 PM PDT by Kevin in California

There’s a lot of debate about the timeline for John Durham’s investigation and when the information will likely become public. Toward that end here’s some food for thought.

First, *if* the “criminal investigation” (as confirmed officially by DOJ spox) resulted in evidence that would push toward a grand jury seating, it must be remembered that could not have started until after June 15, 2020:

The entire DC justice system was frozen in place until after June 15. Now considering a time-frame for typical GJ seating and processing, that would put evidence into the GJ around, say June 20th.

Now take a typical DC grand jury timeline of 5 weeks (Wolfe case May 3rd through June 7th); and contrast that against the complexity of the Durham inquiry (twice duration); and consider recent reports that investigators have only just reached principles (Brennan); then an approximate timeline would be two months +


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: doj; durham; durhamtimeline; sundance; timeline
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Interesting....
1 posted on 08/06/2020 8:43:03 PM PDT by Kevin in California
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

Durham better bring the goods. I’ve always figured DOJ would kick sand over everything. If that in fact is what happens, I am considering what feudal Idaho should look like moving forward.


2 posted on 08/06/2020 8:51:51 PM PDT by Borderline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

Yeah bullcrap. His investigation started in April of 2019. So far not a single SWAT raid, search warrant, or arrest.


3 posted on 08/06/2020 8:53:45 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

He should have had a Grand Jury impaneled June 15th...a year ago. I know a DC snow job when I see it.


4 posted on 08/06/2020 8:56:37 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Yep. The Deep State sleeps well at night. Very well. A hell of lot better than conservatives.


5 posted on 08/06/2020 8:56:45 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

Nobody wants to pull on any of the loose ends for fear the entire usurpation unravels.


6 posted on 08/06/2020 8:57:36 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents|Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California
Here's the image from the article. Lots of names I'm not familiar with.


7 posted on 08/06/2020 8:59:57 PM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All


If Durham was a threat, they’d have been attacking him like Ken Starr a year ago.

Durham hired Dem Prosecutors, like Mueller.

Some lower level sap will be blasted, no doubt.

.


8 posted on 08/06/2020 9:10:43 PM PDT by AnthonySoprano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

“”If Durham was a threat, they’d have been attacking him like Ken Starr a year ago.””

Ken Starr predicts Durham report will show ‘very substantial ... bill to pay’ for FBI senior leadership

https://www.foxnews.com/media/ken-starr-durham-report-substantial-bill-fbi


9 posted on 08/06/2020 9:35:05 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
Yeah bullcrap. His investigation started in April of 2019. So far not a single SWAT raid, search warrant, or arrest.

How do we know? Just because it's not being leaked to the press doesn't mean he hasn't had a grand jury empaneled or used warrants to seize documents, etc. We just don't know, which is as it should be.

10 posted on 08/06/2020 9:41:37 PM PDT by Sparticus (Primary the Tuesday group!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

The whole article reads like a dime novel. It just needs some tick tock boom. Sundance makes it sound like he’s got a big secret that maybe even Durham can’t figure out.


11 posted on 08/06/2020 9:42:19 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

If Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page and a half dozen others are not indicted then the bill is $0.00.


12 posted on 08/06/2020 9:43:32 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents|Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Already setting the ground work for fail? Me personally, I’ll wait to see what is revealed.


13 posted on 08/06/2020 9:53:47 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

14 posted on 08/06/2020 10:01:52 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All


Everyone knows they’d be attacking him unmercifully if he was a threat.

Some new investigation or part of a probe will be offered up to act as the perpetual - Hillary will be indicted - role.

If they want you, they never bypass lesser charges, ever.

They could have Comey and Yates on numerous charges, but they declined.

Just like Classified Docs didn’t matter when it came to Hillary, Huma, and Cheryl Mills.

Just like not registering as a Foreign Agent doesn’t matter if your name is Podesta.


15 posted on 08/06/2020 10:03:22 PM PDT by AnthonySoprano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sparticus

16 months in, and no searches at anyone’s house, nobody has been charged, etc. Face the facts right in front of your face.
And now, 90 days before the election, suddenly he’s going to swing into action?

Yeah, sure...


16 posted on 08/06/2020 10:13:07 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

No, he shouldn’t have. It should have been ready a couple of months ago, but COVID would affect the timeline. It’s still getting pretty tenuous to believe though.


17 posted on 08/06/2020 10:31:38 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

If there’s a pool for this, I’ll take the “Twelfth of Never” for the day something is actually filed to charge any of those people.


18 posted on 08/07/2020 1:47:30 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borderline; V K Lee
Durham will definitely bring the goods. One reason I believe this is what Trump recently told Lou Dobbs:

A nice analysis of this was given by Black Conservative Patriot (BCP) on Youtube. Hat tip: freeper V. K. Lee.

19 posted on 08/07/2020 3:04:34 AM PDT by poconopundit (Iron fist in an Irish velvet glove: Kayleigh the Shillelagh we salute your work!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

“If Durham was a threat, they’d have been attacking him like Ken Starr a year ago.”
______________________________________________________________________________________

Durham has been keeping a lower profile than Sleepy Joe...

AG Barr has been the target of the DS wrath for some time...

And, the Liberal Media Conglomerate lends a helping hand to discredit...


20 posted on 08/07/2020 4:56:59 AM PDT by MCEscherHammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson