Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll shows Utah’s District 4 race is neck and neck
KSL News Radio ^ | BY LINDSAY AERTS AUGUST 3, 2020

Posted on 08/04/2020 4:21:45 AM PDT by 11th_VA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Could be a pick-up ...
1 posted on 08/04/2020 4:21:45 AM PDT by 11th_VA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Nice. I’m also closely following Alek Sklaratos in Oregon CD-4 and John James for Senate in Michigan. Think we might snag a few flips.


2 posted on 08/04/2020 4:23:27 AM PDT by ksm1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

I sent Owens a few bucks after hearing him on Hannity. He’s well spoken and intelligent. (Conservative). ;)


3 posted on 08/04/2020 4:28:04 AM PDT by Does so (Neo-Venezuelans = Democrats = Rioters = Looters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

The total is 70 percent. 30 percent is up for grabs I guess. Polling is a mess I believe everywhere.


4 posted on 08/04/2020 4:29:02 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

If the Dems keep the mail in ballots coming Burgess does not hava a chance.


5 posted on 08/04/2020 4:35:08 AM PDT by chopperk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

I hope Burgess wins. From what I’ve heard, he’s a pretty strong Republican.


6 posted on 08/04/2020 4:35:49 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is thp at they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chopperk

This is Utah not California.
Burgess will win. He has all the momentum. The seat was held by Republicans before the last elections anyway.


7 posted on 08/04/2020 4:54:08 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

He’s an impressive guy. I’m pulling for him big time


8 posted on 08/04/2020 5:10:39 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (See St George's Rap Sheet . . . TAG PedoJoe with "DEFUND the POLICE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

An incumbent that has 30% undecided this late is a sure loser. Owens will win easily.


9 posted on 08/04/2020 5:11:19 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

Unfortunately, it’s in Utah, where some Mormons still abide by the idea that the curse of Cain was a changed colour skin.


10 posted on 08/04/2020 5:30:30 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is thp at they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Does so

Burghess’s campaign has talked to me a couple of times. They are getting heavily attacked for something he didn’t say-—about reviving nuke testing in UT. He said something to the effect that they could resume safe nuclear production there.

Still, I think he’ll win this one. This is one we will have to win to get back the House, plus, I think

NM2
three more CA seats (hold CA25)
hold WI7
win two in TX
OK5
flip at least one in NY, NJ, IL, and MI
one in FL
one in NC
one in VA

Then we’re going to have to find five more.


11 posted on 08/04/2020 6:08:57 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LS
flip at least one in NY, NJ, IL, and MI

The Central NY Congressional seat will be flipped.

12 posted on 08/04/2020 6:11:19 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (#openupstateny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
So, when do you think Mittwitt will endorse Ben McAdams? /s

13 posted on 08/04/2020 7:37:17 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
Unfortunately, it’s in Utah, where some Mormons still abide by the idea that the curse of Cain was a changed colour skin.

White Mormon guilt will elect Burgess. Same reason they elected Mia in the district. Her failure to support Trump is why she lost. Little Ben is a wimp.

14 posted on 08/04/2020 7:42:01 AM PDT by Utah Binger (Utah: Where the world comes to see America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Utah Binger

I hope you’re right, because he comes across well in interviews that I’ve heard.


15 posted on 08/04/2020 7:43:49 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is thp at they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: chopperk

We have had mail-n voting for several years now here in Washington State. My experience is that these district races are on the up and up. But when it get s to the statewide races for Governor and US Senate is where the “just found another box of ballots” shenanigans really begins.

But then I reside in a conservative district and the County Auditor is fair minded.


16 posted on 08/04/2020 7:49:36 AM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

A friend is on the Owens campaign. We’ve had several discussions about the “why” Owens will win. Mainly it’s because he converted to the Mormon Church. That district is in an area that is commonly referred to as “happy valley”, meaning that it’s full of true believers as opposed to the lefty filled Salt Lake Valley.


17 posted on 08/04/2020 7:51:42 AM PDT by Utah Binger (Utah: Where the world comes to see America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
...for whom would you vote,”

Unusual to see correct English these days!

18 posted on 08/05/2020 4:20:50 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30; teppe
Unfortunately, it’s in Utah, where some Mormons still abide by the idea that the curse of Cain was a changed colour skin.


Well; it IS found in their Scriptures

 

Image result for book-of-mormon  2 Nephi 5: 21

 'And he had caused the cursing to come upon them, yea, even a sore cursing, because of their iniquity. For behold, they had hardened their hearts against him, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they might not be enticing unto my people, the Lord God did cause a skin of blackness to come upon them.'

Alma 3: 6

'And the skins of the Lamanites were dark, according to the mark which was set upon their fathers, which was a curse upon them because of their transgression and their rebellion against their brethren, who consisted of Nephi, Jacob and Joseph, and Sam, who were just and holy men.'


19 posted on 08/05/2020 4:31:35 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30; teppe
Very interesting!!
 

In December 2010, the LDS Church made changes to the non-canonical chapter summaries and also to some of the footnotes in its online version of the Book of Mormon. In Second Nephi chapter 5, the original wording was: "Because of their unbelief, the Lamanites are cursed, receive a skin of blackness, and become a scourge unto the Nephites."

The phrase, "skin of blackness" was removed and became: "Because of their unbelief, the Lamanites are cut off from the presence of the Lord, are cursed, and become a scourge unto the Nephites."[26]

The second change appears in summary of Mormon chapter 5. Formerly, it included the phrase that "the Lamanites shall be a dark, filthy, and loathsome people ..." The new version deleted the phrase "dark, loathsome, and filthy" and now reads, "... the Lamanites will be scattered, and the Spirit will cease to strive with them."[26][27]

These changes are seen by some critics to be another step in the evolution of the text of the Book of Mormon to delete racist language from it.[26] On the other hand, some believers in the Book of Mormon, such as Marvin Perkins, see these changes as better conforming the chapter headers and footnotes to the meaning of the text in light of the LDS Church's 1978 Revelation on Priesthood.[28] In an interview, a former BYU graduate student suggested that the changes were made for "clarity, a change in emphasis and to stick closer to the scriptural language."[26]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamanite

 

No changes to the PRINTED version? I guess 'research' into MORMON 'scripture' online is biting headquarters in the BUTT!


At least the changes were not to the actual TEXT of the most 'correct book' ever: the Book of MORMON



20 posted on 08/05/2020 4:36:12 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson