Posted on 07/27/2020 12:35:47 PM PDT by dontreadthis
Well said. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
The implication in this admittedly small sample is that 9 people voted for Trump, but only 7 will vote to re-elect him.
We have some work to do.
“</sarc>”
Thanks for explaining. ;>)
the Democrat party is now the Democrat Nazi Communist party. Its tragic but it sure isn’t the D party of our parents and grandparents’ generations
anyone voting D this time is either suicidal or else an enemy agent trying to help the D’s subvert America from within
Assuming that’s true in Michigan it seems likely that it’s also true in Ohio and Wisconsin.It could even be true in Pennsylvania...at least the parts west of Philly.
That Biden is a puppet is unquestionable. The real question is by who?
Seven out of nine in Michigan isn’t going to get it done this time.
Why do you people accept the premise that Trump is in trouble in ANY of the states he won? There was a survey showing John James up over Gary Peters by 16 points. Another showed Peters with only 28% saying he deserves re-election. Does it make any sense that James wins big while Trump losesNone at all.
One more point, with 77% of Americans (yes I know. I said Americans) saying that they would not tell a stranger they are backing Trump this makes this survey as suspect as the others.
If John James wins in Michigan, Trump wins Michigan. I hope the poll you cite accurately reflects what's happening on the ground there now. John James would be an excellent addition to the Senate.
Focus groups are un-assuming and they start off pretty easy so that you are comfortable. They ask several questions that lead up to the big question.
I was involved in one in Bellevue, Washington in the late 90’s that dealt with removing the Snake River dams to “restore” the steelhead runs and was the only conservative in the group.This was group was hired out of the Colorado State University to host these type of groups and they actually paid us $100 for our time.
All the lead up questions were designed to get you to agree with the basis for the poll, that in the end this will be a great thing, plus the $100 incentive they paid was a psychological tactic to ingratiate you to them. They paint a rosey picture of the future outcome. In my case though they left out the economic impact, so at the end they went around the table and the the first guy said yes he would support $/month on his power bill to pay for the restoration of the steelhead. I was next and agreed that it al sounded great and then went point by point with reason and logic. THe next 10 people admitted that they would have supported it but after my argument they changed their mind. Even the first guy that spoke then changed his mind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.